
Originally Posted by
Trim2L
Hardly. It proves that regardless of the software conclusion a physical test still needs to be conducted...especially when you're slandering your competitors in the process.
You disregarded OP with a bunch of fluff and calling a computer simulation not creditable.
Then you post an example of a similar computer simulation predicting what actually happened in real life.
How is that not a contradiction?
"Not every thing on Earth requires an aftermarket upgrade." demigod/markm
Bookmarks