And so we come to the second challenger - which I had initially discounted.
However, an LGS got one of the Gen 2 MPX pistols in with brace and it is pretty tempting, particularly at the price they've offered to sell it to me at.
So, once again, the idea is ultimately a short 9mm SBR that can fit in my small duffel for overnight and weekend travel.
Mission requirements:
9mm "pistol"/pseudo-subgun
OAL ≤ 22" (in pistol configuration, with stock/brace collapsed/folded)
Ease of conversion to SBR, post Form 1
Ease of mounting a flashlight
As far as I can tell, it's a wash.
MPX advantages:
No 922(r) headaches
Drop-free magazines
AR-15-controls and architecture - including FCG
Magazines are transparent and made by Lancer in useful capacities: 10-, 20-, and 30-rounds (not that I would ever use the 10s)
Can be had for about $300 less than the MKE/MP5
It's here
Modularity: Buy one MPX and it can easily be converted to an SBR, to a 357 SiG, to a 40, to a K-gun.
Keymod interface makes for super easy light mounting
MPX drawbacks:
"SiG-Sauer"
Gen 1 versus Gen 2 magazines
Magazine price and availability
For what I want, I fear the sights sit too high and will be abnormally prone to catching on crap. And while the ability to mount an optical sight readily is nice, it's not needed and, even at that, the MKE comes with a little rail that I can mount to the gun if I want to
MKE/Zenith MP5 advantages:
It's roller-delayed blowback, baby!
H&K gun (swoon) built on H&K machinery (yes, I gave it two positive points merely for existing)
Magazines are readily available and run the gamut from the relatively inexpensive (POF) to the super-expensive Teutonic übermensch (H&K factory magazines)
While expensive (sometimes ridiculously so), spare parts are readily available
SureFire 628 (and 328)
MKE/Zenith MP5 drawbacks:
Not as super modular as the MPX - pretty much have to pick one configuration and stick with it.
Money goes to a NATO ally (yay!) with an Islamist government (boo!)
15-round magazines are only available (from what I can tell) new from H&K. Which makes them expensive. And knocks the capacity down to that of a Glock 19. I'd rather they had 20-rounders, at least that has a minor benefit in capacity over the Glock.
Anyhue. I'm, again, interested in hearing thoughts. And since I want to save time, I've made the poll so you can choose multiple selections: So if you want to vote for, say, both MKEs or one MKE and the MPX you can. Or other. Or all four. I guess.
Thanks!
Bookmarks