Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Gelatin test: .38 spl Speer Gold Dot +P 125 & 135 gr

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0

    Gelatin test: .38 spl Speer Gold Dot +P 125 & 135 gr

    Surprisingly, both Gold Dots failed to expand at all. Also surprising, the lighter bullet penetrated deeper. Now I need to find a better .38 spl load for a short barrel revolver. Maybe the "FBI load"? Anybody have any recommendations?

    Video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6dgkbBxW94

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,190
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewWiggin View Post
    Surprisingly, both Gold Dots failed to expand at all. Also surprising, the lighter bullet penetrated deeper. Now I need to find a better .38 spl load for a short barrel revolver. Maybe the "FBI load"? Anybody have any recommendations?

    Video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6dgkbBxW94
    I'm not persuaded, having seen many more gel shoots and tissue recoveries (wild, human) of those rounds that were excellent.

    I carry that 135gr GDHP, the 110gr Corbon DPX, and the 125 GDHP +P (BHA loading). There are some more threads with test results and opinions on snub loads here as well.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Ga. "tween a rock and a hard place"
    Posts
    452
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Skintop911 View Post
    I'm not persuaded, having seen many more gel shoots and tissue recoveries (wild, human) of those rounds that were excellent.

    I carry that 135gr GDHP, the 110gr Corbon DPX, and the 125 GDHP +P (BHA loading). There are some more threads with test results and opinions on snub loads here as well.
    I agree.I'll stick with the 135's in my snubs as well.
    A fine is a tax for doing wrong.A tax is a fine for doing well.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    You'll note that the velocity is significantly lower than is typically reported for this load. It was about 40 degrees out but that shouldn't be enough to make that big of a difference in velocity. I'd like to see what other folks are getting for velocity out of 2" barrels with the 135 gr +P.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    117
    Feedback Score
    0
    The 135+P load averaged 877fps out of my LCR.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    644
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'll definitely have to do this test again with more shots.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    545
    Feedback Score
    0
    I had been carrying the FBI load in my back up gun for over 15 years after speaking with a FBI agent about the round. The only things I shot with it were injured deer and coyotes.

    A few years ago ammunition testing was being conducted at work and we tested the Speer Gold Dot 135g +P hollow point round. We fired it out of my S&W Model 60 with 1-7/8" barrel into bare ballistic gelatin. The round penetrated over 12" and opened up beautifully. Muzzle velocity was 832 fps measured 15 feet from the muzzle. The temperature was 70 degrees at 94% relative humidity.

    We also tested the FBI 158g +P all lead hollow point the same day and the round did not expand. An ammunition expert was on site and he explained to me that the 158g load was developed for a 4" barrel.

    I have been carrying the Speer Gold Dot 135g + P round ever since I participated in the test.

    I am anxious to hear the results of future testing of the round.
    Last edited by 7 RING; 01-14-13 at 19:21.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    166
    Feedback Score
    0
    I will follow this thread with interest.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Ga. "tween a rock and a hard place"
    Posts
    452
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    7 Ring,back in the day those who didn't carry magnums with my department used the 158gr.+P LSWHP almost exclusively.While I believe your information is correct that it was developed for 4 inch barrels,it's not too shabby from snubs.
    Three of our LEO shootings involved snubs and although there was little to no expansion of this round,it penetrated well and put down the miscreants effectively.
    Like yourself,and as I stated previously, I'll stick with the better Gold Dots anyway.After seeing Doc Roberts'recommendations for these loads,and doing some unscientific testing of my own,I laid in a small supply of the 135+P's for carry in all the snubs.

    If the old FBI loads are all one can get though,they could do a lot worse. Like your sig line says,an old school solution sometimes works pretty well.
    Last edited by DocH; 01-15-13 at 13:35.
    A fine is a tax for doing wrong.A tax is a fine for doing well.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    249
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DocH View Post
    Three of our LEO shootings involved snubs and although there was little to no expansion of this round,it penetrated well and put down the miscreants effectively.
    A slightly expanded or unexpanded LSWCHP is in effect, a wadcuttter. They work well even at standard velocities.

    Maximum expansion isn't always maximum effectiveness.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •