Could it be the ammo that's problem? Have you tried some 55-grain match ammo to see if it really is a bullet-weight vs. rifle-twist issue?
Could it be the ammo that's problem? Have you tried some 55-grain match ammo to see if it really is a bullet-weight vs. rifle-twist issue?
We must not believe the Evil One when he tells us that there is nothing we can do in the face of violence, injustice and sin. - Pope Francis I
Is his 556 barrel FUBAR'D ?
Consider this: the barrel for the 556 is supposed to be identical to the barrel for the Swiss-made 55_ series rifles.
Only problem here: the 55_ rifles are on the 1989 ban list. Since the rifles are banned from import into the US, the barrels are also banned from import - as is the upper reciever (since 2003).
So - your 556's barrel is not Swiss "made." By law it must be made in the US if its for civilian sale.
No one is saying just how Sig is pulling this one off (to our benefit - I am glad they offer the 556 to us).
But, they are probably importing Swiss forged blanks and doing the finish work here. I would suspect Sig-USA's finish work is to blame.
Call SIG, when my SIG 226 ST Elite broke they fixed it within a week, AND payed shipping both ways.
Serving as a LEO since 1999.
USPSA# A56876 A Class
Firearms Instructor
Armorer for AR15, 1911, Glocks and Remington 870 shotguns.
Have you tried different twist rates in otherwise identical barrels? Do the heavier bullets make bigger groups, or start to keyhole, with the slower rate? That's the only way I'd agree that 1:9 is an abominable snowman. 77s and overlength 75s stabilize perfectly well in my 1:9 bean.
When life gives you lemons, insert copper and zinc wires in them and repeatedly shock your tongue.
Interesting...that's the first I've heard of anyone being fed up with a 1:7. My only AR is 1:9. My stash consists of 55 and 62gr. However, I am jonesing for a 1:7 upper.
Serving as a LEO since 1999.
USPSA# A56876 A Class
Firearms Instructor
Armorer for AR15, 1911, Glocks and Remington 870 shotguns.
Bookmarks