How a stock feels or fits your physical dimensions is up to the individual. So are certain features like padded or unpadded, storage requirements, tightness in relation to receiver extension diameter, etc. Also the material used and how it holds up in real world application. Here's a link to an interesting read on several stocks subjected to destructive testing. Not laboratory/scientific but interesting nonetheless.
http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gears...ugh-talk-goes/


Reply With Quote
. Later, the more I shot it, I discovered that I actually really liked traction area profile. I also found the cheekweld to be a good improvement despite it's slim profile. I later switched to a milspec kit and thought I was done. After playing with a friend's SBR with an Emod, then, his bother's with an Imod, I decided to give it a go. I liked the much better cheekweld. It spoils you after a while. Another feature I liked was the wider traction area. I found it to be more forgiving in certain positions than my CTR.

Bookmarks