So what burden do buyers hold in this instance? IE their obligation to ensure they're not receiving stolen prop?
Or is it all on the seller of said property?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So what burden do buyers hold in this instance? IE their obligation to ensure they're not receiving stolen prop?
Or is it all on the seller of said property?
Numerous surplus outlets and even a few individuals have in fact been prosecuted for receiving stolen government property. The key to this is in the term "knowingly". Most commonly, it is the seller that is prosecuted as in most cases the evidence lies in the possession and access to the source. When stolen property is recovered, the buyer is not reimbursed or compensated. Most good deals just aren't. If the price is too good to be true, avoid it.
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
Any Army logistician worth a damn can find out. The problem isn't if it was ever owned by the .gov, it's whether or not it is STILL owned by the .gov.
I can look up serial numbers and tell you whether or not it's owned by Uncle Sam.
Last edited by TheBelly; 02-10-13 at 01:01.
Don't the Military auction off old Aimpoints as surplus? I thought that the Military would action off big crates of stuff but the pound including optics, brass etc.
Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/
Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/
M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141
Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com
Bookmarks