MO to confiscate?

[.46caliber]

Question: I'm not familiar with the source, Gateway Pundit, can anyone speak to the validity or trustworthiness?

Edit: Irrelevant, here is the horse's mouth.


http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking...ro/HB0545I.HTM

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

[.46caliber]

Did some more research. Bill has been read in the house floor twice.



http://www.house.mo.gov/billactions....ar=2013&code=R

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

[jawalterusmc]

Glad to be living in G E O R G I A

[Ttwwaack]

I was stationed there for some time @ FLW before the big boom in 96. I loved the hills and outdoors. Although there are alot of FUDDS there wit ther 30-30s, I can't see this passing. I could see some military bases there beong refuges for personnel caught behind the lines though.

In the long run though, it will help availability about the last thirty days prior to enactment. Hard part is I don't recall any specific registration for black rifles while I was stationed there so I think it might be kinda hard to find all them rifles on the Ozarks with dem hill people.

[ST911]

“MO Marxists introduce bill to confiscate weapons...Give owners 90 days...”
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=124374

[.46caliber]

Its not going to pass. The 4 "special" individuals behind this bill are simply testing the waters.

I still wrote my district rep and I think I will call the sponsor and cosponsors and share my disgust.

I never expected this kind of BS at the state level here.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

[.46caliber]

Response I received from my district rep:



You may rest assured that I am a staunch supporter of second amendment rights and will not support any efforts at further gun control. With the makeup of our legislature, I would say this bill is DOA

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

[Ick]

“MO Marxists introduce bill to confiscate weapons...Give owners 90 days...”
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=124374

Unfortunately that thread that you brought up is only for 200+ posters. Kinda excludes most of the people here.

[platoonDaddy]

Unfortunately that thread that you brought up is only for 200+ posters. Kinda excludes most of the people here.

In my opinion we need a 2A thread that ALL members are able to express their opinion. Even on this forum I have seen a divide between LEO's and the common folks. Their (progressives) goal of divide an conqueror is working.

Of course in my opinion we are now in four groups:

1. shootist

2. hunters

3. not in my state

4. don't give a ****

Many of us fall into all of the above, BUT we better get off our ass and support each other.

[gunrunner505]

In my opinion we need a 2A thread that ALL members are able to express their opinion. Even on this forum I have seen a divide between LEO's and the common folks. Their (progressives) goal of divide an conqueror is working.

Of course in my opinion we are now in four groups:

1. shootist

2. hunters

3. not in my state

4. don't give a ****

Many of us fall into all of the above, BUT we better get off our ass and support each other.

I'll bet a lot of hunters are in cat 4 there. Unless they hunt with an AR any ban really won't screw them too bad.

The not in my state guys are dangerous, they have their heads in the sand, because it can happen anywhere. When you're not looking, that's when they will slip it through at midnight.


Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk 2