Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: so who's got some fun little pet loads for TAC?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    so who's got some fun little pet loads for TAC?

    i've got some 55 grain FMJ's and some 75 grain hornady match BTHPs.

    last time out i used 25.5 grains behind the 55's and 22.0 behind the 75's.
    POI was about 1.5" low with the 75 grain bullets.
    16" middy. 1 in 7 twist.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,942
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I just run 24.5 gr of TAC with my 55gr FMJs.

    Works great in the carbine, Shorties, and Rifle.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by demigod View Post
    I just run 24.5 gr of TAC with my 55gr FMJs.

    Works great in the carbine, Shorties, and Rifle.
    any idea what that chronos at out of a 16?

    i think i might make a bunch of experimental rounds tommorrow. goin shooting with my buddy who has a chrono on saturday.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    160
    Feedback Score
    0
    I use 24 grains of TAC with a 55 grain fmj and get 3000 fps out of a 20" barrel.
    They work beautifully in a 16" gun as well, but I didn't chrono them out of the short gun.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,942
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by skyugo View Post
    any idea what that chronos at out of a 16?

    i think i might make a bunch of experimental rounds tommorrow. goin shooting with my buddy who has a chrono on saturday.
    I sure don't. I was basing my load off of the data sheet for TAC. I tried Kurt Reifurt's 24 grains as a starting load, but I was getting slightly weak cycling in my guns. So I kicked it up a half a grain. I'm pretty happy with that load.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Utah, USA
    Posts
    1,735
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I have been looking into using TAC but have heard that it is dirty. For me, this is a big issue, so I typically use Vitavuori powders.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MarshallDodge View Post
    I have been looking into using TAC but have heard that it is dirty. For me, this is a big issue, so I typically use Vitavuori powders.
    i've heard it's one of the cleaner ball powders, and that seems to be true.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by demigod View Post
    I sure don't. I was basing my load off of the data sheet for TAC. I tried Kurt Reifurt's 24 grains as a starting load, but I was getting slightly weak cycling in my guns. So I kicked it up a half a grain. I'm pretty happy with that load.
    i based mine on the sierra reloading manual's AR15 section. 24.7 is the min. they recommend.

    i'm goin to chrono all these in a bit. i'll report back.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,942
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    It seems to be cleaner than 748.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    ok..

    22.0 grains tac, 75 grain hornady- 2450 fps ave.

    23.0 tac, 75 grain-2570 ave

    25.5/55 grain- 2750 ave

    26.0/55 -2900 fps


    fairly consistent velocity was had with the tac.

    my 1 in 7 twist lightweight cmmg really groups nice with those 75 grain bullets. seems like they'll drop like rocks though. they hit 2" lower than my hot 55 grain loads

    military 63 grain ammo (lake city) chronos just a touch over 3000.
    so .223 loads are pretty light for 5.56 guns i'm thinking....

    that said, i primarily punch paper, so i'll probably stick with the 25.5/55 grain setup for most of my shooting. seems to group pretty nice and it's quite economical.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •