|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last edited by sinlessorrow; 02-22-13 at 15:48.
LMT enhanced carrier has the same bearing cuts. (as the Colt carrier sinlessorrow posted) They introduced them sometime ago...
Last edited by E-man930; 02-22-13 at 15:38.
Another benefit of the sand cuts is that the grooves retain lubricant.
Typos brought to you via Tapatalk and autocorrect.
If LMT did that with their enhanced carrier, it'd be the tits.
We miss you, AC.
We miss you, ToddG.
They did...or used to, the main issue I have with the LMT carrier is it really only works in the 14.5"-16" guns, I would prefer a carrier that functioned in them all.
Another thing to note is I wonder if there is a possibility that Colt could do this with their standard carriers for the M4 if it proves to work and no IC is selected(haha). They could possibly do something like a TDP update? yes or no?
Last edited by sinlessorrow; 02-22-13 at 18:32.
The Colt sinless pictured has multiple recesses for the sandcuts.
My LMT e-carrier only has one on each end of the rail.
Benefits & disadvantages of both designs as far as moving dirt away from the rail interface?
LMT's design appears it would aid in drag reduction.
-Jax
Last edited by jaxman7; 02-22-13 at 19:34.
Bookmarks