I was readin the Q&A from the IC and noticed one response stated CL was a environmental pollutant. Does this mean the Army is moving away from CL? Given the recent turn for goin green I found this interesting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Okay, I just skimmed through the IC thread, but didn't find the reference to CL. What does CL stand for?
Man, I knew I was reading too much into it. Thanks.
The Q&A does not do much to really tell you alot but this is it.
51. Is chrome lined barrel considered an environmental pollutant?
RESPONSE: Yes.
I wondered if it wasnt a requirement to be environmentally friendly after the whole "green" ammo thing, but making them ask if CL was "green".
I don't know much about the green ammo.
It seems to partially answer my question, perhaps the Army is moving away from lead? I don't know, that's why I asked.
Looks like some research on green ammo is in order. I"ll add it to my list of things to look into for the sake of being aware.
Green ammo?What's next bombing the enemy with hugs and kisses? The military's job is to destroy America's enemies, foreign and domestic (there are plenty of both right now). It's not there to play enviro-politics.
The way things are going, Hussein is going to have the military itself classified as an environmental pollutant and move towards a "greener" alternative. A kinder, gentler Islamophilic force. This treason disguised as Care Bear bullshit has gone way too far.
Bookmarks