Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Burris MTAC

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    70
    Feedback Score
    0

    Burris MTAC

    I got the bug a few years back on pig hunting. Since then I have decided to get a rifle that could take down pigs and hunt deer with since my state did not allow .223 to be used on deer (that has changed). I decided on an AR platform since all of the grumbles that a black rifle isn’t used to hunt and I chose 308 as the caliber since the ammo was easier to find then a lot others. I next had to decide on an optic. Most of my shooting would be under 200 yards, but I wanted to be able to reach out too if I needed to. I also wanted an illuminated reticle. I feel that an ACOG would have been perfect for what I was wanting all except for price. My price range was about $600.

    A buddy of mine had a Burris Tac30 on his 308 AR and it appeared to be what I wanted. The downfall of the Tac 30 was that the illuminated sight was a button and hard to manipulate. I checked out the Mtac which had a dial to turn off/on and change the brightness. The reticle reminded me of the EOTEC sight. I am not a long distance shooter, but more of a close quarter shooter and have used EOTEC for little more than a decade.

    I got the combo package which came with the scope, mount, and a fastfire red dot. I didn’t really need the red dot, but it was just a $100 more while they usually go for $200.

    The scope was a lot bigger than I had hoped. The one thing I would change was the ring to change magnification is tuff to turn and a knob on it would complete it. I can use it with both eyes open like an EOTEC or I can close my weak eye and settle in for precision type of group. For precision wouldn’t be the best choice since the center dot pretty much takes up a 2inch circle at 100 yards, but it was great for what I needed. The scope is a 1x4 and came with the red dot on top. I changed the red dot to out front on the forearm and attached it to an offset mount from GG&G. A simple roll of the gun and I have a close up red dot.

    Here is a group I had from 100 yards. I had just sighted in my ammo I was going to shoot on hunts and was screwing off enjoying shooting from different positions with cheaper ammo when I relized I did not have any shots for groups. My cheap ammo shot low compared to my hunting ammo, but it does show what I could do. The bottom one was my first shot and I knew I had put it a little low since I did not have the gun locked into me like I should have.



    I decided to paint this gun so the scope and red dot also got painted. Here are some pics of the scope on the rifle. Notice the red dot off to the front in a offset mount.





    An over the top view.



    Of course its first hunt it did just what I wanted. I used Hornady 165 BTSP and shot the pig at about 150 yards while he was on the move.



    While an ACOG would have been better, I am very pleased with my MTAC and would buy another.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    113
    Feedback Score
    0
    Good shooting.

    When all is said and done are you happy with the MTAC for the role? I'm considering one to do the same.
    NRA Life Member, NAHC Life Member, GOA member

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    284
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I think they are good bang for the buck. I was impressed with the clarity of the glass at the price point. I just couldn't get myself to like the ret.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    70
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbang View Post
    Good shooting.

    When all is said and done are you happy with the MTAC for the role? I'm considering one to do the same.
    I am very pleased! I have only 200 rounds thru it with the scope and one hunt. For what I wanted it fit the role perfectly and would buy it again. No buyers remorse, yet.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    70
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pingdork View Post
    I think they are good bang for the buck. I was impressed with the clarity of the glass at the price point. I just couldn't get myself to like the ret.
    Don't blame you. Like I said I have a lot of time behind EOTECHs and I like it. I feel I am a lot quicker on target than the normally crosshairs, but I could see where this reticle is not right for many.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,714
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I think the MTAC is a neat little scope for it's price and what it is. sold mine and wish I had it back for my training gun...
    never push a wrench...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,193
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I bought an MTAC 1.5-6x40 for my Colt LE6920. It is for general range use, and looking back on it now I should have probably gone with the 1-4x24 instead, but I do like the extra magnification, and larger objective. With the QD PEPR mount I can take it off and either mount a red dot or use the irons.

    However, I was shooting it at my range today and a guy had a Leatherwood Hi Lux CMR 1-4x24 mounted on his AR M4gery. I shot his rifle, and let him shoot my setup. I thought the Leatherwood was a little better than my MTAC. I seemed a little clearer, and I liked the reticle better. I may pick one up, as they also seem like a good value.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •