Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 110 of 110

Thread: My 2nd review of the Primary Weapons piston conversion

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,202
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    thanks robb. i had yet to figure out whether bone dry or a light coat of machine gunners lube (or even sentry solutions dry lube) was better to use on the piston, and which one is easier to clean up carbon deposits on later.

    my printed manual has the 'not for anal insertion' warning.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    368
    Feedback Score
    0
    gotm4 and militarymoron,
    Were your gas block screws staked like PWS is advertising now? If not, do you feel staking the gasblock will hold as good as taper pins?

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    10,781
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sniperfrog View Post
    gotm4 and militarymoron,
    Were your gas block screws staked like PWS is advertising now? If not, do you feel staking the gasblock will hold as good as taper pins?
    To be honest I don't think staking will do much if anything at all. Nothing beats pinning which is why it's in the TDP. Crane recalled MK12s because set screwed gas blocks shot loose in the field and in combat on direct inpingment guns and Crane pinned them, 'pinned is the way' for gas blocks/FSBs anyone who tells you otherwise should be considered a poor source for information on the AR.............Well maybe MIG welding the gas block to the barrel would be stronger but then it would also be permanent.
    Chief Armorer for Elite Shooting Sports in Manassas VA
    Chief Armorer for Corp Arms (FFL 07-08/SOT 02)

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    461
    Feedback Score
    0
    mine are double staked.

    havent loosened yet, but then again, im only a few hundred rounds in at this point.


  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,202
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    mine weren't staked so i staked them myself. this was probably just in case any adjustments needed to be made as i was one of the willing guinea pigs/pre-production testers.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,202
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)

    vid of PWS

    i posted a vid shooting my PWS upper:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z3xiyuzzps

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Northwest IN
    Posts
    3,119
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Kel you seem to be getting less recoil out of the PWS than the HK. Is that because of the brake or the actual piston systems?

    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball...

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,202
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    (not kel), it's not an apples-apples comparison as my PWS is a 16" midlength system, and the 416 was a 10". and yes, i'm sure the FSC556 brake has something to do with it as well.
    as for piston vs DI, the 416 definitely felt like it had a sharper recoil impulse than the 10.5" LMT CQB MRP upper, which didn't have a brake on it.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    34
    Feedback Score
    0
    I picked up a 16 in PWS upper and so far it is running very well. I am a bit worried as the gas block is not pinned as many have suggested may be ideal. How much custom gunsmithing is required to make this happen?

    I guess I would rather be proactive then assume I will not have a issue. Would running the heavier buffers place more stress on the rods and gas block? I would think the energy required to begin moving the heavier weight rearwards would make a sharper impact on both.
    Last edited by superman07; 05-04-09 at 14:43.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    10,781
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by superman07 View Post
    I picked up a 16 in PWS upper and so far it is running very well. I am a bit worried as the gas block is not pinned as many have suggested may be ideal. How much custom gunsmithing is required to make this happen?

    I guess I would rather be proactive then assume I will not have a issue. Would running the heavier buffers place more stress on the rods and gas block? I would think the energy required to begin moving the heavier weight rearwards would make a sharper impact on both.
    I'm using a H2 weight Seth Harness anti-tilt buffer with mine. When I used a H buffer or H3 buffer the rifle recoiled more than it does now.

    Any decent machinist or good gunsmith could taper pin the PWS gas block. I did mine with a drill press and reamed it by hand. It was very time consuming because I had to go at it at a slight angle to avoid the factory Colt taper pin hole in the barrel. I reamed it by hand with a hinge pin reamer and it's held up fine. If I were to do mine today I would drill/pin it higher up near the top of the front edge of the gas block to avoid the taper pin holes on the bottom of the barrel. This would be much easier using a milling machine to mill a flat spot and then drill a 1/8" hole through both the gas block and barrel at the same time. Then ream it by hand and install a standard Colt taper pin or use a straight pin at least 1" long.
    Chief Armorer for Elite Shooting Sports in Manassas VA
    Chief Armorer for Corp Arms (FFL 07-08/SOT 02)

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •