I locally shoot a monthly 3-gun match where the maximum range is only 80 yards, but some of the targets are hand-sized steel to simulate greater distances. I also live in a rural setting where a homeland-defense SHTF type rifle should be capable at least to 200 yards (the distance through deep woods from my house out to the main drive).
Currently I'm running an Aimpoint ML2 with a 4 MOA dot. At the last match, a fellow shooter lent me his 3x magnifier, which was the first time I had ever tried one. The small targets were bigger and easier to see, but so was the dot. So these targets got hidden behind the dot pretty much the same, whether shooting with or without the magnifier. Didn't really help much. The same thing would be happening with that zombie hoard or band of renagade bikers coming through the woods to my house!
I'm now looking into some kind of upgrade from the 4 MOA ML2, which I figure will be either:
(A) another Aimpoint with a 2 MOA dot, along with the separate magnifier, or
(B) some kind of variable-power scope.
Looking around, it seems like taking option A is going to run me somewhere $1200-$1300 altogether, which appears to be roughly the same as the option-B S&B scope that I'm learning is highly regarded.
Other option-B choices, however, seem to cost a lot less. This includes the Nightforce, but it apparently has some brightness issues. The Trijicon Accupoint also is a lot less -- I'm not yet sure of any drawbacks it may have.
The other impression I got using the Aimpoint-magnifier combo was the much more limited field-of-view. I had to spend more time searching around for the next target before I could engage it. Option A would allow me the full field for CQB by just swinging the magnifier out of the way, whereas any option-B set-up would likely still limit the field even when cranked back to 1x.
Given my needs outlined above, what would you recommend?
Thanks for any help.
Bookmarks