Jpipes,
I don't recall you saying I was full of shit. That was another member.
At any rate I will still stand by my position that selecting a .223 for 1000 yard shooting, even of paper, is a less than ideal choice. I am not out here advocating a .338 Lapua for crying out loud, just a fairly mild .260 Remington or a 6.5mm Creedmoor as better choices.
Will ammo be more expensive? Sure it will be a bit more $$$ per round. Can't argue that. It will cost more to reload a .264/6.5mm than it will a .223/5.56mm both in the cost of bullets and powder charges, although realistically we're only talking about a 20gr difference in powder charge here.
I will note though that in the case of a 6.5mm Creedmoor you can just order match ammo that will work great from Hornady. Which you can't do with a .223 and loads using heavy 80-90gr match bullets, at least I don't know of any. So you're stuck with a hand loading only proposition. No getting lazy and buying a few hundred rounds of factory loads when you don't have time to reload, or don't feel like it.
Plus the ballistics of the 6.5mm in either .260 or Creedmoor form are better than a heavy .223. An 82gr Berger in .223 has a BC of .444, vs a 142gr Berger with a BC of .612, and both will start out at about 2700fps with maxed out loads according to Hodgdon. If it were me, I would pay the extra money for the 6.5mm but that is me.
I will note that personally I would put up with the relatively shorter barrel life, and step up to a 6.5mmX284 Norma, but I like that round and have some friends who have been shooting it for awhile and have gotten excellent results with it.
Bookmarks