I don't care what you think about Stephen Colbert, this is hilarious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I7VD7SlgEg
C co 1/30th Infantry Regiment
3rd Brigade 3rd Infantry Division
2002-2006
OIF 1 and 3
IraqGunz:
No dude is going to get shot in the chest at 300 yards and look down and say "What is that, a 3 MOA group?"
Shit...for that kinda money there better be a lawn chair and cocktails while the gun shoots itself.
Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio...Amen
"Don't get on the boat if you're not ready to go all the way"
So, does it come completely set up and zeroed so I don't have to go through that process?
This is what they say: "The system uses a laser reference hard-mounted directly to the gun barrel. The laser reference is calibrated at the factory immediately after the gun is zeroed to ensure that the laser provides a permanent, virtual reference of where the gun barrel is pointing." So, yes, they zero it at the factory, but, I wonder what happens if you detach the scope from the rifle.
They use the Who's who of precision shooting: Surgeon, Krieger, AI, McMillan, even a Blackout 90T. Interesting...
It sounds like they work as advertised. Thanks!
You still have to be able to call the wind and then input that value. The system does not figure it out for you.
I am the military products manager for Lasermax
Latest reports from the Snipers' Hide says the weapon shoots well in ideal and standard conditions, but vacillates in windy climes. If we can continue to develop this nascent technology, I'd imagine we could greatly extend the max effective range of common long-range calibers. The biggest challenge will probably be inputting accurate meteorological data in to the system on the fly.
Exactly.
I think the media is doing what the media does best by stirring a bunch of shit up. They make it seem as if a rifle capable of hitting target at 1000 yards is somehow rare and special.
As many have pointed out, $27000 to hit a target at 1000 yards is dumb. A regular joe could learn to do that with a $600 rifle, decent glass, and a couple hundred bucks in ammo. The very experienced shooters who have been doing it for a long time would probably feel like the TP rifle was ill suited to the task due to the variables required and lag time on the trigger.
But, this is just the first or second generation of the tech. My guess is that it will probably evolve into a much more compact and portable form for use with standard optics. I wouldn't want to let the scope control when the rifle fires, but some of the features might be handy.
But, regardless, I'm just waiting for the new 1000 yard rifles to become the next "assault weapon" that must be controlled, registered, and banned.
Too late.
The VPC put this out back in 1999 during the last AWB. It's pretty clear what their intent is. Page 37 is where things get very frustrating.
http://www.vpc.org/graphics/snipcov2.pdf
Last edited by BrigandTwoFour; 06-15-13 at 10:15.
Bookmarks