|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1:7 will stabilize a heavier bullet, so if you're inclined to shoot specialty loads, or something other than the usual 55 grain range fodder, this may be a consideration. For most, 1:9 will more than meet the need.
AC
Stand your ground; don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. -- Captain John Parker, Lexington, 1775.
When I was researching in 2011/2012 I was looking at all kind of railed setups and even monolithic uppers. I decided to save my cash upfront and get the basic Colt 6920 and if I need a rail later on to choose from one of the many options out there.
Right now as a basic defense and range firearm I see no reason to upgrade the stock hand guards.
Get the Colt, swap out the sling and learn the basics with the irons (you might need therm someday even if you plan on goign with an optic), get an optic (unless you really like the irons) and take a class. From there you should have a good idea how you may want to setup your rifle. Add a white light and your GTG for home defense. There are a good number of ways to attach a white light to a rifle with stock hand-guards so I would not buy a rail just to attach a light.
Anyone else feel the Magpul furniture mentioned above is worth it? The cost for that AR isn't much more than a stock 6920, which makes me think it might be worth doing up front rather than paying for later.
Here is another option that could save you some money on taxes: LMT Defender Lower at Rainier + BCM BFH 16" Mid at BravoComanyUSA
“All falsehood is a mask, and however well made the mask may be, with a little attention we may always distinguish it from the true face.”
State of Franklin Training Group
That's what I get for not doing complete research. I didn't realize the 6721 has a 1:9. But, as Army Chief pointed out, many folks get by with that twist just fine. I had a 20" Colt with a 1:9 and it was very accurate and bullet lengths with weights up to 69 gr, but the longer barrel has a bit more velocity which translates into higher bullet RPM. I'm currently using a 20" & 16" barrel with a 1:8 and both shoot fine. For a carbine length AR, I would favor 1:7 or 1:8 over 1:9 for a bit more versatility
INSIDE PLAN OF BOX
- ROAD-RUNNER LIFTS GLASS OF WATER- PULLING UP MATCH
- MATCH SCRATCHES ON MATCH-BOX
- MATCH LIGHTS FUSE TO TNT
- BOOM!
- HA-HA!!
-WILE E. COYOTE, AUTHOR OF "EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW IN LIFE, I LEARNED FROM GOLDBERG & MURPHY"
I am American
I agree with the BCM Middy above and customize to you needs. What I did for my first AR was a Aero Lower, BCM Upper, ACT Trigger, and LPK from White Oak
Lots of Good Options
My preference would be to avoid the 6940. I THINK the upper and rail are one piece which severely limits your possibilities for changing it in the future, even more so with the front sight.
I'd say that your reasoning on the sights have some valid points, but also some flaws. I too prefer the reticle of the EOTech as it is very fast, but want an Aimpoint on an HD weapon because of its always-on capability and battery life. Also, I'd take an EOTech over the Aimpoint when on the range as the center dot is half the size of the smallest Aimpoint reticle (1 MOA vs 2) and there are ways to estimate holds with the EOTech (Kyle Defoor had a blog on this IIRC). They both have their ups and downs, obviously.
Almost all Magpul gear is awesome. Cheap price but durable and very functional. Get the Magpul edition, the handguard feels so much more ergonomic and its almost as easy to attach stuff to as a quad rail without the weight or price.
My preference as well. Its just easier.
Last edited by Wake27; 07-02-13 at 16:09.
Sic semper tyrannis.
Bookmarks