Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Anyone Used Their Side Chargers in Classes?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    135
    Feedback Score
    0

    Anyone Used Their Side Chargers in Classes?

    Hey all,

    I'd like to hear from any of you who own a side charging upper (ASA, LAR Grizzly, etc) and have taken your firearm to a class of some sort or have otherwise pushed it hard.

    The "you'll get dirt and grime all in the guts of your rifle and jam!" argument gets rolled out with regularity, and it doesn't seem to be without merits, but I'd like to hear from the guys with actual experience.

    How did your rifles hold up? Did you actually jam up with crap in and around the bolt, or did things function acceptably?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,795
    Feedback Score
    0
    I really don't see the point in this gimmick device. I've read about one but have never seen one in any carbine class. As a user on anything mechanical, you must make a constant effort to take care of your weapon in any environment. That means keeping the BCG properly lubed, cleaning it as necessary, and keeping the dust cover closed when not in use or when the fight ends. Some people have to be constantly reminded to keep the dust cover closed. Keep it open in dusty or loose dirt environments and guess what? Eventually the weapon stops working. It's that simple. It is a training issue, not a gimmick issue. Don't underestimate the power of stupid.
    For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    135
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RogerinTPA View Post
    I really don't see the point in this gimmick device. I've read about one but have never seen one in any carbine class. As a user on anything mechanical, you must make a constant effort to take care of your weapon in any environment. That means keeping the BCG properly lubed, cleaning it as necessary, and keeping the dust cover closed when not in use or when the fight ends. Some people have to be constantly reminded to keep the dust cover closed. Keep it open in dusty or loose dirt environments and guess what? Eventually the weapon stops working. It's that simple. It is a training issue, not a gimmick issue. Don't underestimate the power of stupid.
    So... no.

    Thanks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,795
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Will_Power View Post
    So... no.

    Thanks.
    And no this isn't TOS. You may want to pose your question over there.
    For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    135
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RogerinTPA View Post
    And no this isn't TOS. You may want to pose your question over there.
    Golly gee, thanks for clearing that up for me.

    Side chargers seem like they would have some merit in precision shooting. Yet, like everybody else, I've got questions and concerns to how they would hold up in practical use if someone was to take a class or go hunting through the mud and the muck.

    But, no one appears to have any empirical evidence one way or the other. It's all chest-beating circle jerking.

    That's why I'm asking here (as well as TOS), as there's generally a higher percentage of guys who have valuable experience down range or in training.

    Or maybe I should just go toss a side charger on my SBR .300 BLK with the grip pod, 3-9x, and 45 degree backup sights and call it a day.
    Last edited by Will_Power; 07-08-13 at 19:43.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,795
    Feedback Score
    0
    Last edited by RogerinTPA; 07-08-13 at 20:00.
    For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10,039
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RogerinTPA View Post

    Which doesn't seem to work very well for most people....


    Side chargers are an interesting beast, and the largest question should come down to those people who have seen actual issues. The FAL, AK, SCAR, M14, M1 and plenty of other weapons have shown a side charging weapon can be plenty functional and effective.
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    I think the side charger from JP is a very interesting design. I would like to know how well it performs, too.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,421
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Will_Power View Post
    Golly gee, thanks for clearing that up for me.

    Side chargers seem like they would have some merit in precision shooting. Yet, like everybody else, I've got questions and concerns to how they would hold up in practical use if someone was to take a class or go hunting through the mud and the muck.

    But, no one appears to have any empirical evidence one way or the other. It's all chest-beating circle jerking.

    That's why I'm asking here (as well as TOS), as there's generally a higher percentage of guys who have valuable experience down range or in training.

    Or maybe I should just go toss a side charger on my SBR .300 BLK with the grip pod, 3-9x, and 45 degree backup sights and call it a day.
    Maybe you should. After all, if you really want to know, go try it out. Go shoot the rifle.

    There's little empirical data because not many here want a side charger. I've looked at them myself because I like the idea and a folding, non-reciprocating charging handle on the FAL works very well. However, you have to put out an exorbitant amount of money for that type of upper for an AR.

    The other type of side charger I looked at features a bolt threaded into the side of the BCG. After studying it, I've come to the conclusion that it complicates dis-assembly, looks fragile and is likely to keep loosening up. I also do not want a charging handle on an AR that is reciporcating. I also have a concern that the larger ejection port will decrease the stiffness of the upper (check the upper flex sticky for more information). I don't see how they can offer any advantage over the standard AR charging handle on a precision rifle.

    I do find the standard AR charging handle to be a bit awkward, especially on my new S&W M&P-10 with it's stiffer action spring. But the disadvantages of the side charger (cost, potential for causing malfunctions, loss of receiver rigidity) outweigh the gain. For me, installing a BCM Gunfighter CH is a more practical solution

    Don't let this stop you from trying a side charger upper. Run it hard and let us know how it works. Worse that could happen is you get to thumb your nose and say "Told ya!"
    Last edited by MistWolf; 07-08-13 at 21:23.
    INSIDE PLAN OF BOX
    1. ROAD-RUNNER LIFTS GLASS OF WATER- PULLING UP MATCH
    2. MATCH SCRATCHES ON MATCH-BOX
    3. MATCH LIGHTS FUSE TO TNT
    4. BOOM!
    5. HA-HA!!

    -WILE E. COYOTE, AUTHOR OF "EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW IN LIFE, I LEARNED FROM GOLDBERG & MURPHY"

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,184
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I have always thought there should be two major changes made to the AR rifle.

    1) The sight plane should be 1-1/4" lower to reduce the amount of sight error induced by canting the rifle. The sight plane would still be 3/16" higher than the M-14 or AK-47 to accommodate wearing a helmet and gas mask.

    2) A side charging handle would make it easier to maintain your check weld when cycling the bolt.

    Take your rifle to a high round count course and let us know how it performs.
    Last edited by T2C; 07-08-13 at 21:37.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •