So I was looking at Aimpoint stuff today, and saw how cheap the Aimpoint PRO was as opposed to the Comp ML3. The PRO is $408 as opposed to ML3+mount being around $670. Is there a reason? As far as I see it, the PRO can do everything ML3 can do and more like night vision and coming with a mount. The only thing PRO falls behind the ML3 is the battery life and that isn't even too bad. 30,000 hours vs. 50,000 hours is the only thing ML3 seems to have the upper hand at. Opinions? Thoughts?


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks