What is the upside for Israel accepting this cease-fire?
15,000 UN Forces will secure the boarder.
Since 1978 we have had UN Forces at the boarder there. Most recently it was 2000, and they accomplished zero. With the size increase by about 7.5 times, I still would bet they accomplish zero.
If Hezbollah wants they can just fire rockets over the heads of the UN Troops and into Israel. If they use the longer range rockets that Iran has admitted to giving them, they can actually pull farther back away from the UN Troops and go right over everyones head and into Israel again. The UN will not stop them, and if Israel felt the need to enguage with ground troops, they have to get around the UN troops who will be stuck in the middle.
With this resolution the UN will not have the authority do disarm Hezbollah, not that they would have had the motivation or the capacity to do so anyways.
Does Israel get their kidnapped soldiers back? I don't beleive so.
So I ask, why would they sign on. I don't see a single upside for Israel in this agreement. Is it that they just don't want to continue to enguage Hezbollah any longer? Are the various risks too great if they were to continue to try to accomplish their military objectives?
By the way, who is going to enforce Res#1559? . . . anyone ? . . . .anyone . . . ?
Bookmarks