
Originally Posted by
Failure2Stop
Ok.
I've watched all three.
First, you seem like a good dude, so that gets you a leg up.
Criticism on data presented:
Always confirm distance through actual measurement; tape can work, but laser gets my vote.
The problem with using reticle subtention is that sometimes reticles are slightly off, any angle will induce error, and measuring with a less than 2% error is tough thorough an optic. Laser range finders are easy, and eliminate a lot of error elements.
Truing:
Is a method for long range precision, however, lots of folks jump into it before really having all the pieces of the puzzle. A slight zeroing error at 100 can give the wrong impression of what's going on down range. Data gathering is hugely important (at least, according to my school of thought on long range marksmanship).
Typos brought to you via Tapatalk and autocorrect.
Bookmarks