G&R Tactical
Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314
Results 131 to 133 of 133

Thread: TQ vs pressure dressing

  1. #131
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,042
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    This thread has been the biggest load of mental masturbation I've seen here. And for M4C, that's saying a lot.

  2. #132
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southwest PA
    Posts
    6,311
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Arctic1 View Post
    you are using stats saying that an ineffective TQ, either partially or totally, leads to increased morbidity and mortality to prove that I am clueless and inconsistent in my stance.
    Ok I'll try one more time...how do you get that from this?

    Total ineffectiveness (continued bleeding) was WORSE than partial ineffectiveness (persistent distal pulse) in that 61% and 51% had morbidity and 9% and 2% mortality rates, respectively.
    That quote is from the article YOU cited (page S44) the stats EXPLICITLY state that an ineffective TQ has DECREASED MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OVER DOING NOTHING AT ALL.

    Either you can't read or you can't count. Neither gives you much credibility.
    Last edited by Gutshot John; 09-10-13 at 18:14.

  3. #133
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,476
    Feedback Score
    0
    I want to apologize for the needless back and forth, and for the thread bump linking to the blog post.
    I have given my advice to the OP, and will bow out of this discussion.

    @Gutshot John:

    We'll have to agree to disagree. Good night.
    It's not about surviving, it's about winning!

Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •