This thread has been the biggest load of mental masturbation I've seen here. And for M4C, that's saying a lot.
This thread has been the biggest load of mental masturbation I've seen here. And for M4C, that's saying a lot.
Ok I'll try one more time...how do you get that from this?
That quote is from the article YOU cited (page S44) the stats EXPLICITLY state that an ineffective TQ has DECREASED MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY OVER DOING NOTHING AT ALL.Total ineffectiveness (continued bleeding) was WORSE than partial ineffectiveness (persistent distal pulse) in that 61% and 51% had morbidity and 9% and 2% mortality rates, respectively.
Either you can't read or you can't count. Neither gives you much credibility.
Last edited by Gutshot John; 09-10-13 at 17:14.
I want to apologize for the needless back and forth, and for the thread bump linking to the blog post.
I have given my advice to the OP, and will bow out of this discussion.
@Gutshot John:
We'll have to agree to disagree. Good night.
It's not about surviving, it's about winning!
Bookmarks