Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 400 Blk ever happen?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    111
    Feedback Score
    0

    400 Blk ever happen?

    So sticking a 762 in a 556 cartridge worked out great with minimal parts changes. Would a 40 cal in the 762 work just as well? Modify an AR10 and you'd have a pretty awesome hunting gun without the over-power of current 40 cal options or 338 magnums. Then again the 458 socom and 450 bushmaster never took off.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northeast Tennessee
    Posts
    332
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Re: 400 Blk ever happen?

    40 might be a bit much for that case...but 33 to 35 would work.

    The 358 Winchester is a fine round, been around a long time...just never caught on...its just a necked up .308.

    I have a Browning BLR in 358 Win.
    Last edited by Ridgerunner665; 08-08-13 at 18:15.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    colorado, usa
    Posts
    201
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by maw1777 View Post
    So sticking a 762 in a 556 cartridge worked out great with minimal parts changes. Would a 40 cal in the 762 work just as well? Modify an AR10 and you'd have a pretty awesome hunting gun without the over-power of current 40 cal options or 338 magnums. Then again the 458 socom and 450 bushmaster never took off.
    though interesting, couple reasons i really doubt it, esp if you're talking about a .40 cal pistol bullet(?)

    these things are designed for like 1200fps. out of a 7.62 case they'd be much, much faster - like hyper-velocity.

    due to that velocity, they'd probably act like one of the very light varmint bullets out of .223 (i.e., extreme fragmentation and very shallow penetration). that has potential merit, but would make an extremely expensive prairie dog round...

    unlike blackout, they're not rifle bullets, so would lose velocity quickly, limiting range.

    the appeal of .300blk, socom and .450bm is that they fit in the standard (and nearly ubiquitous) AR size envelope. huge benefit not only from user interface & parts commonality, but also extending to support equipment like mag pouches, etc.
    .300blk takes that a (giant) step further and also uses "standard" .308 bullets, 5.56 brass, and unaltered BCG & magazines. this in addition to it's incredible ballistic versatility...
    it's a case study in "what's the best we can do with what we already have."

    the 7.62 AR is a much rarer beast, so the COTS ratio is much lower off the bat. add in the AR10/SR25 split and the probable need for specialized .400 bullets, and you've probably moved out of the serendipitous sweet spot that is .300blk (and certainly the rest of the AR-envelope cartridges).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    733
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Google JD Jones, SSK Industries, or the Whisper lineup. He's got the 338 Whisper and I believe the 416 Whisper. Same concept as the 300 Whisper/BLK but bigger.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    197
    Feedback Score
    0
    Or .338 Spectre. 6.8 spc necked up to .338 (I think). I don't know much about the cartridge, but I think it will throw the lighter .338 bullets at supersonic speeds.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    60
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by High Tower View Post
    Google JD Jones, SSK Industries, or the Whisper lineup. He's got the 338 Whisper and I believe the 416 Whisper. Same concept as the 300 Whisper/BLK but bigger.
    JD Jones has a made whisper in damn near every caliber, many are just not on the ssk website.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    As if 300 blk ammo isn't hard enough to source.
    Originally Posted by Iraqgunz
    This is 2012. The world is going to end this December and people are still trying to debate the merits of piece of shit, cost cutting crap AR's. Really?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    N. Georgia, USSA
    Posts
    1,143
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    There's the 338 Spectre from Marty TW, the guy behind the 458 socom.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    947
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)

    Re: 400 Blk ever happen?

    There is the 44 auto mag but that's a pistol round

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    And what would this magical .40 rifle round do that a current .308 offering won't do? Factory grain weights from 110-180 grains that generally give a good spread of bullet designs. And really from all accounts there is nothing in the lower 48 that can't be taken by a .308 as long as the grain weight is correct for the hunting application.

    Or you could do some homework and come back with:

    .338 Federal

    Which has some pretty good ballistic data as well as being built in an auto platform by DPMS and Armalite. And probably could be built on an AR-10 receiver by a custom guy since the barrel is the only thing needing replacement. The .338 Federal was built and designed as a big game cartridge to fit into the .308 sized actions and autoloaders.

    Other than the obvious "wow, neat, let me shoot it just to say I did" factor and giving the standard gun rags something to drool over, claim its the next "military issue cartridge!" and continually write about for a couple of months, there really isn't a justification for a .40 on top of a .308 case. Neat? Maybe, but not really something the market is looking for.

    But if you want to make your own wildcat cartridge, go for it.
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •