Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: IL governor to consider using National Guard to guard gun violence

  1. 09-22-13, 12:57 #1
    Javelin's Avatar
    Javelin
    Javelin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)

    IL governor to consider using National Guard to guard gun violence

    http://www.kmov.com/news/politics/Go...224775182.html

    Seems like police state is a reality.
    Originally Posted by Iraqgunz
    This is 2012. The world is going to end this December and people are still trying to debate the merits of piece of shit, cost cutting crap AR's. Really?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-22-13, 13:43 #2
    polymorpheous's Avatar
    polymorpheous
    polymorpheous is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,908
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Wouldn't that mean MORE guns on the street?
    Quote Originally Posted by scottryan View Post
    Anybody that owns or sells pistol versions of assault rifles is a bottom feeder, irregardless of the ban status of certain ammunition.

    They are illigetimate weapons that have no real purpose other than to attract retards to the gun community.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-22-13, 16:12 #3
    MountainRaven's Avatar
    MountainRaven
    MountainRaven is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    SWMT
    Posts
    8,160
    Feedback Score
    32 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by polymorpheous View Post
    Wouldn't that mean MORE guns on the street?
    And more "weapons of war" on the streets of Chicago!
    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-22-13, 16:31 #4
    polymorpheous's Avatar
    polymorpheous
    polymorpheous is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,908
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    For real.
    Quote Originally Posted by scottryan View Post
    Anybody that owns or sells pistol versions of assault rifles is a bottom feeder, irregardless of the ban status of certain ammunition.

    They are illigetimate weapons that have no real purpose other than to attract retards to the gun community.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-22-13, 16:37 #5
    jpmuscle's Avatar
    jpmuscle
    jpmuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,406
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Yea.. I'm not really loving the precedent that would set..


    By their logic though that would turn Chicago into an all out war zone, since their violence epidemic is directly caused by black assault weapons..
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-22-13, 17:31 #6
    Mauser KAR98K's Avatar
    Mauser KAR98K
    Mauser KAR98K is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,733
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Should this be against Gang Violence as opposed to Gun Violence??
    Last edited by Mauser KAR98K; 09-22-13 at 17:45.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    SPORTS are for Kids!...click*
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-22-13, 17:36 #7
    jpmuscle's Avatar
    jpmuscle
    jpmuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,406
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mauser KAR98K View Post
    Shoulkd this be against Gang Violence as opposed to Gun Violence??
    To the well read and rationale individual that would seem to be a logical distinction that should be made... but to these twits conceptually they are one in the same.
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-23-13, 03:25 #8
    Moose-Knuckle's Avatar
    Moose-Knuckle
    Moose-Knuckle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wakanda
    Posts
    18,863
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    So when was the last time the NG was allowed to carry live rounds when deployed to US cities to restore order after/during a disaster/riot/etc.?
    "In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf


    "We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-23-13, 04:39 #9
    jpmuscle's Avatar
    jpmuscle
    jpmuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,406
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Moose-Knuckle View Post
    So when was the last time the NG was allowed to carry live rounds when deployed to US cities to restore order after/during a disaster/riot/etc.?
    What happened during Katrina? I don't remember.
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-23-13, 06:00 #10
    T2C's Avatar
    T2C
    T2C is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,164
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    National Guard is not necessary. Governor Quinn and Rahm Emanuel need to let Chicago PD do their job and tell the Cook County judges to do their jobs.

    The Governor and the Mayor also need to support the police and judiciary when relatives of people who are arrested start complaining.
    Train 2 Win
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules