Funny how the difference between $920 and $1,100 seems like a lot to some, especially when the quality difference is worth more than $180.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funny how the difference between $920 and $1,100 seems like a lot to some, especially when the quality difference is worth more than $180.
Right!! its like spending 100 grand on a car but not wanting to spend 30 bucks to get the tires and rims for it...
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=134715
Check out post #4. Looks like it isn't the first with the carbon bushmasters!
$180.00 represents a lot of money for some.
I know a guy who works for Walmart, makes very little money and owns a BM. He's embarrassed to admit he owns this brand as he knows it's loe quality level, but told me it was all he could afford. He bought it used for a fairly low cost.
He loves to shoot and so far his BM has delivered.
As long as it works and he isn't planning on taking it into Kabul or Chicago then whats the problem?
A lot of us here carry/have carried a gun for a living, so the thought of having a weapon that's not 100% reliable is something we would never consider, especially when you can get that reliability for just a couple hundred dollars more. I'd rather wait a little longer and get a rifle I can depend on than buy a sub-par gun RIGHT NOW.
Just because you live in small town USA doesn't mean you'll never be put in a situation where you'll have to defend your life or the lives of your family.
0311
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I agree, for just a few hundred more, a much better base gun could be had. Not to mention resale value. When you can't rely on it 100%, it's a range toy.
Bookmarks