Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Interesting .223 Federal Fusion Test

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rjacobs View Post
    I have basically switched to the 62g Fusion load away from 75g TAP. I believe the 62g Fusion is one of the best all around loads for self defense, hunting, etc... for the AR platform. Maybe its not THE BEST, but as an all around performer, its hard to beat. I havent sold any of my 75g TAP and still keep a few mags of it around, but I dont have it in the guns any more.
    it does seem that TAP T2 comes apart pretty fast in gels. you think too much velocity might be the reason for that? if it was slowed down a little would it perform better?

    the black box FPD 223 version is slower than the red box right? does it do better in gel tests?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    Just an update, the "jacket" of the Gold Dot is pure copper.

    This leads me to ask...


    ...back when the Barnes bullets were new (no grooves), they had bad fouling issues.

    Have any departments/high round-count users noticed fouling/accuracy issues over time with the Gold Dots?
    I have also confirmed this, pure copper jacket.

    As for your question, I'm interested as well. Perhaps they use a powder to keep fouling down?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,370
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    I have also confirmed this, pure copper jacket.

    As for your question, I'm interested as well. Perhaps they use a powder to keep fouling down?
    Like CFE 223? Certainly possible. CFE really does reduce bore fouling.
    "That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892

    "The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
    Like CFE 223? Certainly possible. CFE really does reduce bore fouling.
    That's what I was thinking but dint know the name. I remember reading there was an additive that reduced the copper fouling. Anyone know what it is, I may be able to test for it at work.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    I have also confirmed this, pure copper jacket.

    As for your question, I'm interested as well. Perhaps they use a powder to keep fouling down?
    are the Fusion bullets pure copper?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,390
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mr h View Post
    are the Fusion bullets pure copper?
    no, which is obvious if you have ever looked at one.

    They are a copper jacketed, lead core, soft tip projectile.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,390
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mr h View Post
    it does seem that TAP T2 comes apart pretty fast in gels. you think too much velocity might be the reason for that? if it was slowed down a little would it perform better?

    the black box FPD 223 version is slower than the red box right? does it do better in gel tests?
    Im just fine with a bullet coming apart quickly in gel and dumping its energy.

    Thats not at all WHY I switched to the fusion/gold dot type bullet.

    My 10.5" SBR is my go to gun. The loss in velocity of a 10.5" barrel REALLY reduces the range that you will get reliable fragmentation. Switching to a bullet that relies more on mushrooming and deforming the tip to transfer energy really opens up that range. Supposedly the Fusion will "open up" down to around 1700fps. I believe(I dont have access to my chrono data) that pushes my effective distance out to 150-175 yards where with a projectile I have to rely on fragmentation to work is only like 75-100 yards out of the 10.5" gun.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rjacobs View Post
    no, which is obvious if you have ever looked at one.

    They are a copper jacketed, lead core, soft tip projectile.
    I think he was referring to the jacket. I'm assuming it is, since it's basically a rebranded gold dot. I can verify if there is intest, or if no one can confirm.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    uh, arent we talking about the jackets here?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    31
    Feedback Score
    -1 (0%)
    I'll be trying these on deer here in the next month. I got 5 tags so looking forward to seeing the results.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •