Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Remington 700 accuracy issue

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    6,302
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    You can see some of this,but shooting the gun with high quality ammo is the only real test.
    And a rem 700 factory gun is as good a bet as any.

    If it truly sucks, you just have to rebarrel which is not the norm.

    PB
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,177
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    The pictures Ring posted are pretty good. A quick test is to put your thumbnail into the crown and rotate your thumb. If you hit any snags (by which I mean an actual snag, not the smooth bump you get when going over a land) it's ****ed. That's a cursory inspection, but if it doesn't pass the snag test there's no sense in even looking at it further. The ****ed up crown illustrated in Ring's post would not pass the snag test.

    Passing the snag test doesn't necessarily mean it's good, it just means it's worth looking closer. You will reject 30% of the Remingtons on the shelf with this test alone.

    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post
    A quick question for you. If I'm looking at a used rifle at some place like Cabela's, is there a method you would recommend to examine a crown?

    Maybe a good magnifying glass and a pocket flashlight? I do know a local gunsmith that is well-versed in the operation of a borescope. But I would have to buy the rifle first.

    Any tips for the average Joe to keep in mind when he looks at a barrel crown?

    I know that building a precision rig is a different ball of wax, but you brought up a good point.

    Thanks.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    27,195
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ring View Post
    just a FYI, i tried Winchester 69 grain match... they sucked BAD
    I'm assuming WIN still uses the SMK. Thus... that is amazing... you REALLY have to work hard to get an SMK to shoot bad. Even Black Hills can't manage to screw up the Matchking bullet.
    "You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    6,302
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Just to clear up my post if it was confusing. Like Ring and Quiet said, if the crown is noticibly jacked up, don't even go down that road.

    To further help, how much $$ is the gun? What profile is the barrel!

    PB
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,886
    Feedback Score
    44 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by QuietShootr View Post
    The pictures Ring posted are pretty good. A quick test is to put your thumbnail into the crown and rotate your thumb. If you hit any snags (by which I mean an actual snag, not the smooth bump you get when going over a land) it's ****ed. That's a cursory inspection, but if it doesn't pass the snag test there's no sense in even looking at it further. The ****ed up crown illustrated in Ring's post would not pass the snag test.

    Passing the snag test doesn't necessarily mean it's good, it just means it's worth looking closer. You will reject 30% of the Remingtons on the shelf with this test alone.
    Thanks, I appreciate the tips. I live within walking distance of a Cabela's, and always check out their used rifle racks a few times a week. That's an easy test to use.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •