
Originally Posted by
mkmckinley
I got PRK to correct an astigmatism and 20/40 nearsightedness from the Army and it worked great. I still have 20/15 seven years later. The way it was explained to me is that PRK is a little more painful up front with a better success rate while LASIK is less painful but has a higher complication rate. The main complication is/was supposedly clouding of the lense. I have no idea if that has changed in the last seven years but given that the PRK wasn't all that painful I'd opt for PRK again in a heartbeat. My only real complaints were some moderate photophobia the first year which only affected me in very bright conditions. I just wore sunglasses. I don't remember noticing a big difference in starburst.
edit: I forgot to add that FWIW the military will disqualify you for a bunch of stuff if you've had LASIK but not PRK.
I haven't heard of PRK. Have a consultation appt soon and will inquire about this. I would gladly deal with more pain at outset if it has a better success rate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My 7 iron is more accurate than my capabilities. Same with my AR.
Bookmarks