Originally Posted by
exkc135driver
I learned about the so-called Survival Summit about 6 hours before it began. I thought, "wow,” and immediately signed up. I made a list of which sessions I wanted to listen to. I was pumped up …
What I found was that the sessions are actually recorded telephone interviews of the various presenters. While there are nuggets here and there, most of the information is either basic or painfully obvious (the presentation on how to fortify your home emphasized the importance of locking your doors. Gee, I never thought of that …).
I watched a total of 6 presentations before deciding that I was wasting my time. One of the presentations, by Marjory Wildcraft on locating the perfect survival retreat, was very well done. Perhaps not coincidentally, that was the only presentation which was recorded without the “help” of the interviewer. Unfortunately, things went downhill from there.
Another presentation I, ah, watched was, um, James Hubbard on, um, surviving a, ah, nuclear, you know, event. His presentation was, um, constantly, and I, um, mean constantly, punctuated by “um,” “ah,” and “you know.” No, Dr. Hubbard, I don’t know, because if I did know, I wouldn’t need to watch your presentation.
While this will not matter to some, many of the PowerPoint slides are ungrammatical, are misspelled, or simply use the wrong words. “Deterrents” is not the same as “deterrence.” “Wont” is not the same as “won’t.” “Gama” is not the third letter in the Greek alphabet. The poor quality of the slides serves only to lessen the already-substandard quality of most of the presentations.
Most important, however, is this: many people think, wrongly, that the sole requirement that a good teacher (presenter, lecturer, educator, briefer -- call it what you will) must have is mastery of the subject matter. That is absolutely not true. A professional symposium, which this purports to be, should be presented by people who not only know what they are talking about, but who can present the material in an interesting and engaging way. The individual presentations should be supported by materials (whether videos, handouts, PowerPoint slides, etc.) which have been thoughtfully prepared and proofread before the presentation.
These days we seem to be constantly presented with numbered lists … the 7 habits of successful people, 20 things to never do after you’re 50, etc. So in that spirit, here are 4 rules (pay attention!! These are the four must-know secret rules which will improve your presentations, increase your sexual stamina, cure cancer, and make your Glock obsolete!!! I normally sell these rules for the low price of $99.00, but because I’m such a nice guy I’m giving them to you today for absolutely free!!) for internet presentations:
1. Present your own material. Hey, Mr. Producer, I want to hear from the expert, not you and not some interviewer! The expert knows what he wants to say, so I want him (or her) -- not you! -- to control the presentation.
2. Be prepared. Know what you, um, are going to, ah, say, and maybe, um, practice it beforehand, you know?
3. Don’t misrepresent the visual aids. As someone else noted, “the term ‘video’, means VIDEO, not slide show. I could get this kind of experience listening to a podcast.”
4. If the material is prerecorded, listen to it before airtime. If the sound quality stinks, fix it. If the slides have issues, fix them. If you want to be professional, then be professional.
As we used to say back in the day, remember the 6 P’s -- Proper Preparation Prevents Piss-Poor Performance.
Maybe they’ll do it right next time.
Bookmarks