Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Burris 1-5x24 XTR II, which reticle?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    16
    Feedback Score
    0

    Burris 1-5x24 XTR II, which reticle?

    I am going to purchase a couple of Burris 1-5x24 XTR II's. One will go my 20" Colt AR15A2 Government Model in an ARMS #2 mount with ARMS #21 rings. The second on will go on my son's Colt 6920 M4 Carbine in a LaRue LT-104 mount. I am trying to decide which reticle to go with, the XTR II Ballistic 5.56 Gen 3 reticle or the XTR II Ballistic CQ Mil reticle. These are general purpose rifles for home defense, 3 gun matches, coyote hunting and plinking. What do you recommend and why. Thanks.
    Last edited by ar15a292f; 01-25-14 at 13:18.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Jacksonville NC
    Posts
    30
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    The CQ mil, simply because a Ballistic reticule is only designed for a average load and rifle. Mils would be more practical for me at least

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Wouldn't the ballistic reticle be more practical on this type of scope using holdovers in a defensive role? Seems like the mil reticle would make more since in longer range where there is plenty of time to dial?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    16
    Feedback Score
    0
    In a defensive role I would just use the center dot and horse shoe portion of the reticle. I am not military or law enforcement, so the chances of having to use hold overs in a defensive situation are very slim. Now 3 gun matches and coyote hunting will provide an opertunity for longer range shooting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    125
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I own the Gen 1 with the ballistic reticle and am looking to replace it with something mil-based (it lives on my 16'' 3 gun rifle). I shoot Black Hills Mk 262 for my precision load, and the holdovers on the BDC are calibrated for M193 out of a 20'' barrel, so I have had to get creative with my zeroing scheme to bring the hash marks in line with the trajectory.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    16
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am starting to lean towards the Ballistic QC Mil reticle because of the versatility.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,796
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Bullet drop reticles hardly ever match the exact ballistics of your load in your rifle. But if you know those, you can use a ballistic calculator to determine the impact distance for each mil or moa hash in a mildot or moa-hash reticle. I'd get the CQ-mil.
    ____________________________________________________________________________________
    Use InfoGalactic instead of Wikipedia - avoid Wikipedia's left bias

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Product reviews stating "Only 4 stars because I haven't used it yet" are an idiot's signature.
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,273
    Feedback Score
    10 (92%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ar15a292f View Post
    I am starting to lean towards the Ballistic QC Mil reticle because of the versatility.
    What do you do for cheek weld on the A2 with the height of the handle, mount and rings? Do you have an adjustable comb? GH

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    16
    Feedback Score
    0
    Right now just use a low check weld. That combination is fairly low for a carry handle mount, about a 3/4" rise above the normal line of sight. I do have an old Cheeroke Arms cheek piece that I can install. It is like the one Colt put on the Delta HBAR, without the Delta markings.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •