You should read the second link first. It has a wealth of historical data re primer development. I guess I flipped the links when I copied them.
You should read the second link first. It has a wealth of historical data re primer development. I guess I flipped the links when I copied them.
I'll do that. Thanks.
(edit: I had indeed read this before. It has been a while)
I most recently was googlizing .308 Palma to see if we could rob the Russian Primer train twice by using these for our .308s. I'd come across Salazar's comments on the 7-1/2 Rem primers defeating the purpose of the Palma small rifle primer ignition.
Last edited by markm; 03-05-14 at 12:06.
"What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v
For what it's worth....
Although we've fired 10s of thousands of these WOLF primers without a problem (other than H335 loads), I still jump back to a CCI primer for my Defense handloads in that an aggressive primer is an added level of reliability worth giving up Accuracy and small S.D.s for defensive combat purposes.
"What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v
I'd sideline those for Blaster ammo with ball powder. Having different components is always a good thing. As much as I like the Russian primers, I still like having some regular primers around too.
"What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v
There's guys that believe that you HAVE to use #41s to safely load for ARs.
"What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v
What do you guys not like about the #41s? Why should you not use them with H322?
B.A.S. Mechanical Engineering Technology
Bookmarks