!!! RANGE REPORT !!! BCM BFH 14.5" mid length w/ 13" KMR hand guard.

[Endur]

I am selling the upper I have now to get the same one. Good stuff. Are you using a standard RE? I would drop that brick and get a T-1.

[HD1911]

Nice, clean, and simple, yet highly effective. I like it.

Just out of curiosity, why the standard profile and not the lightweight?

[funkybassplayer]

I am selling the upper I have now to get the same one. Good stuff. Are you using a standard RE? I would drop that brick and get a T-1.

I'm sorry but what do you mean by standard RE?


-BTO-

[funkybassplayer]

Nice, clean, and simple, yet highly effective. I like it.

Just out of curiosity, why the standard profile and not the lightweight?

Thank you! I have shot lightweight profile gun and while they are lighter I find that the standard profile, with that lil extra weight makes the rifle swing a bit smoother in transitioning targets for me. Just my experience.


-BTO-

[jmk]

That is a heck of a nice upper - and quite the upgrade from DPMS!

I'm surprised, though, that the BFH isn't giving you somewhat tighter groups with the premium rounds and "short" barrel.
What were your groups like with the "utility" rounds?

I ask since I'm trying to choose between BFH and SS for my next build (I'm looking for approximately 1 moa). I realize the differences between the two, but I figured(hoped) the BFH would be around 1.25 consistently, esp w/match rounds, and that would be fine considering the increased durability and longevity of BFH+CL over SS.

regardless, you'll clearly be well served by that upper - enjoy!

[kangy]

Love that upper!

[funkybassplayer]

That is a heck of a nice upper - and quite the upgrade from DPMS!

I'm surprised, though, that the BFH isn't giving you somewhat tighter groups with the premium rounds and "short" barrel.
What were your groups like with the "utility" rounds?

I ask since I'm trying to choose between BFH and SS for my next build (I'm looking for approximately 1 moa). I realize the differences between the two, but I figured(hoped) the BFH would be around 1.25 consistently, esp w/match rounds, and that would be fine considering the increased durability and longevity of BFH+CL over SS.

regardless, you'll clearly be well served by that upper - enjoy!

This was all shot with a 4x scope using a CQB reticle. ImageUploadedByTapatalk1394124315.524116.jpg
The center dot in the reticle is 2.4" @ 100yds.

I absolutely believe that with a higher power scope or even te same scope with more of a target reticle I could get tighter groups.

With "utility" rounds and standard range fodder I get about 3" groups if I do my part. I have a 4.5-16x Nikon on my remmy 700 .223 that I may at some point try on lil sister but with the magnification and reticle I had I was pretty happy.


-BTO-

[Ark1443]

Glad to see you ditched the DPMS and found yourself something worthwhile! Nice groups as well.

[funkybassplayer]

Glad to see you ditched the DPMS and found yourself something worthwhile! Nice groups as well.

Well the DPMS work great for me for the past year then I started having major key holing issues. I'm loving the BCM an all their products though.


-BTO-

[Endur]

I'm sorry but what do you mean by standard RE?


-BTO-

Yes a carbine receiver extension.