|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892
"The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."
Would it not be hypocritical of someone who registers SBRs under the NFA to advocate having an illegal unregistered "assault weapon" under the NY SAFE act though? I'm not saying anyone is advocating this, but I'm sure a few are that aren't voicing their opinions for obvious scrutinization reasons.
IG could've simply been saying to take the rifle out of the scope of "assault weapon" and thus avoid registration legally. But regardless of his particular stance, the question in general is a good one. Why is registering for the NFA ok but registering for the NY SAFE act not ok? Both allow you to have a legal and unregistered "assault weapon" with some sacrifices; the NFA sacrifices barrel length flexibility and automatic fire, the NY SAFE act sacrifices a lot more.
"I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein
Realistically, what is the next and most logical step in registering firearms under the safe act as well as Connecticut's law? There debating the next step in enforcement as we speak in Conn, and have no idea what there going to do but they want to save face pretty bad. I would never register a firearm, since your clock is ticking until there gone IMHO. I understand the but you register NFA items argument, but you have the choice to not own NFA items and not register. Theve gone full retard in the north east, good luck with your decision, ultimately it's up to you and your family. The winters in AZ are awesome by the way.
And you have the choice to not own a full-featured "assault weapon" and not register as well, such as by using a stock in the OP's post and removing other "evil features." Or alternatively by converting the rifle so it no longer has a "removable" magazine by using a bullet button.
Btw, "they're" = they are, "there" is used in reference to a physical object's location.
"I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein
I live in a relatively free state and a semi-free country when it come to firearms. I do what I have to do to stay legal. I don't like it and oppose it in every legal way I can. I live within the rules that apply with as full a knowledge of the long term consequences as my small mind can handle.
If I was in the OP's position I would make the necessary modifications to avoid registration because you know what the next step is going to be. Don't fool yourself. Have a plan for your families future.
My roots in my region go deep as I'm sure most here can relate to. Moving, while an option to some, is a last resort in many cases. Make the best best of what you've got wherever you are; get your ass and your friends asses up and involved in changing things back and never give up.
"One riot, one Ranger"
Registering a firearm is a slap in the face to the second amendment. There's no one particular state I care so much about that I would choose registering my firearms over moving. My opinion for you is A) move, or B) make it compliant without having to register.
Last edited by Free Agent; 03-31-14 at 13:30.
We all register handguns.
'Evil Minds That Plot Destruction'
No, WE don't! At least not in TX.
To everyone:
If you have filled out the little yellow form 4473, you have registered your weapon. Don't fool yourself.
"You cannot play fair with people who don't care if you get wiped off the map. You don't have to hate everyone who isn't part of your tribe, but it is foolish to keep caring about people who don't care about you."
Speech at the second National Policy Institute conference, December 26, 2013.
See you soon, AC.
Bookmarks