Weirdo. You mean to tell me you don't take off your optic between shots to demonstrate RTZ capability?! Pfft. Poser.....
I don't think I've got a single optic that has ever been removed and replaced on a gun without taking it to the range shortly thereafter anyway. Anyone who isn't confirming zero after dicking with their optics deserves to miss whatever shot they're trying to take. Is it convenient when it's close to zero? Sure, but a couple clicks and slipping my turrets takes all of 15 seconds. Maybe. With the Accupoint turrets it literally takes 3 seconds. "Oh, an inch left ::click click click click:: BANG! Sweet!! ::lift slip, down:: man, that was easy...."
Maybe I just don't understand the big deal with all the RTZ claims. Seriously, who gives a shit really? You're shooting your gun on a square range (or damn well should be) after you finger bang stuff to begin with.
I certainly like the lower profile of most QD mounts on the market over a couple giant thumb screws (not so much Bobro as they stick 3/4 of an inch off the gun), but I have absolutely zero expectations from any of them aside from their ability to solidly mount my optic to my gun.
As far as this relates to the VCOG, it doesn't. I certainly don't think it's a game changer or anything. It's Trijicon's effort in an already saturated market of low-powered variables of various pedigrees. If it had co-witnessed fiber/tritium reticle as well as the illuminated reticle it would be cool. As it stands now, it's in the middle with any other player in that specific market. Is it more durable? Most certainly. Does 99% of the civilian market care? Not a chance. 2 or 3 or 4 years ago this would have been the Short Dot killer. Right now it's just another scope in an already saturated market.



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks