Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Big brother is at it again!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,256
    Feedback Score
    10 (92%)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    7,928
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Dat mental retardation...
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,929
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    At least we are still the home of the brave.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    #FreeKekistan
    Posts
    3,291
    Feedback Score
    0
    That article doesn't give much of an explanation as to what happened to have this legislation considered. Anybody know what this is all about?

    I don't know 40+ people that I would want at my house but still this is some dumb stuff...
    If you can't win a gun fight against a lightly-trained individual during broad daylight with 88 rounds of 30-06, I'm not sure you'd be able to do it with... any other firearm.
    -Fjallhrafn
    Ok, I've got an El Camino full of rampage here, so what's the plan?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,178
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Big A View Post
    That article doesn't give much of an explanation as to what happened to have this legislation considered. Anybody know what this is all about?

    I don't know 40+ people that I would want at my house but still this is some dumb stuff...
    In sure it has something to do with large parties at people's home every weekend. As a youth, well maybe a bit into my 20's as well my teams always had a hang out. Usually someone's home. We would congregate before games and come back after. Pretty much an all day affair every Sunday. When you think of 18 guys, their girl friends, kids and other associates the size got pretty big and the street was congested.

    I'd venture some uptight person felt their property values were being hurt by the incessant partying and got their legislator friend to come up with some idiotic law. Isn't that how it usually works.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Don't open the door. If you decide to open the door, don't answer any questions, and don't consent to a search. Problem solved.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,706
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Don't open the door. If you decide to open the door, don't answer any questions, and don't consent to a search. Problem solved.
    Yeah, because Barney Fife is just gonna get back in his patrol car and drive off.

    Stats man! Gotta get them stats!
    Why do the loudest do the least?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    7,928
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Don't open the door. If you decide to open the door, don't answer any questions, and don't consent to a search. Problem solved.
    According to the article, it would fall to the Dept. of Code Compliance which took the initial complaints. Sounds to me like they'd issue you a civil citation and you'd have to prove that you DIDN'T have more than 49 people at a single gathering, and that you DIDN'T have up to 49 people at a gathering more than 3 times in a 40 day period. So where does the individual code enforcement official draw the line? Is a family gathering more than three times in a 40 day period grounds for issuing a citation, just because the neighbor who hates you calls them every time there's a car parked in the street in front of your house?

    The simple answer is "No, you may not regulate the gathering of American citizens on private property as a function of any government, ever." Feel free to regulate public disturbance, sanitation, parking, whatever... But not "gatherings". That is completely out of bounds.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    Yeah, because Barney Fife is just gonna get back in his patrol car and drive off.

    Stats man! Gotta get them stats!
    I hear ya man.
    Quote Originally Posted by glocktogo View Post
    According to the article, it would fall to the Dept. of Code Compliance which took the initial complaints. Sounds to me like they'd issue you a civil citation and you'd have to prove that you DIDN'T have more than 49 people at a single gathering, and that you DIDN'T have up to 49 people at a gathering more than 3 times in a 40 day period. So where does the individual code enforcement official draw the line? Is a family gathering more than three times in a 40 day period grounds for issuing a citation, just because the neighbor who hates you calls them every time there's a car parked in the street in front of your house?

    The simple answer is "No, you may not regulate the gathering of American citizens on private property as a function of any government, ever." Feel free to regulate public disturbance, sanitation, parking, whatever... But not "gatherings". That is completely out of bounds.
    Thanks for the additional info. I'd still tell any and all of 'em to go get ****ed.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,100
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Not to be one of those "First they came for the . . . " guys, but I don't even know 49 people, much less have occasion to invite them to my home.

    You young whippersnappers and your hip-hop biographies and whatnot. Bout time somebody drew the line!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •