Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Another spin on the basic 20" rifle.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    305
    Feedback Score
    0

    Another spin on the basic 20" rifle.

    I've been a member of M4C since 2009, mostly lurking as my post count would reveal. I spent a few years buying and shooting pistols until last year when circumstances forced me to liquidate everything down to the last cartridge. I've spent the last several months doing what I should have done: Shooting a vast assortment of pistols and rifles and improving by basic firearm skills and marksmanship.

    It wasn't until now that I finally put together an AR-15. After spending much time reflecting on the 2A, it came to me that the reason we have a right to keep and bears arms is because as free citizens we have an obligation to keep and bear arms -- envisioning the way things should be: An M16 in every closet. Every American a rifleman.

    I waited a year or so for the Colt AR-15 A4 to be released. With the craze not quite over it seemed like their A4 was vaporware with no real release date, so a few months ago when by chance I noticed that BCM 20” upper assemblies were back in stock for the first time in ages, I impulsively jumped and snagged one. My initial thought was to build a USMC M16 A4 clone, a basic proven setup to build my rifle skills upon, which led me to acquiring all of the USMC-issued Knight Arms parts for the build in fairly short order.

    When it came to picking a BCG I spent a crazy amount of time searching and comparing different coatings and treatments and enhanced/PiP BCG designs. In the end I decided to go with the no-BS option from BCM. Above all I wanted reliability, and the bolt is the heart of the system. For the charging handle I wanted an improved design for strength but without the snag risk of some the large and toothy oversized designs, and the Mod 5 was a perfect answer that took me some time to discover since no one seems to talk about it.


    (I didn't feel like pulling the RAS back off just for the sake of the parts photo.)

    UPPER:

    BCM standard 20” upper assembly
    BCM BCG
    BCM Gunfighter charging handle Mod 5
    Knight Arms M5 RAS
    Knight Arms vertical foregrip
    Knight Arms Micro Flip-up Rear sight, 200 to 600m
    Daniel Defense QD swivel mount
    Grip Pod GPS-02

    Once the upper was complete the lower became a much longer quest, in part due to the scarcity of options at the time and in part due to new information as I continued to search and research extensively. Very long story short, the ergonomic advantages of a carbine stock with good cheekweld won out over the traditional aesthetic of an A2 or A1. I spent a lot of time with the AR-15 weight calculator, playing with different component mixes to keep the total weight reasonable while keeping the assembled rifle from being too nose heavy. I wanted the finished rifle (sans optic) to weigh no more than a stock AR-15 A4 with carry handle and A2 stock and handguard (7.7 pounds). In the end, I overshot by 3/10 of a pound.

    The V7 Heavy receiver extension is a novel component that on the one hand allowed me to improve the balance of the build without having to use one of the bulkier storage-capable stocks like the eMod, or the ship's anchor of the UBR, but at penalty of still exceeding my weight goal. The 4140 RE weighs approximately 6oz more than a 7075 RE, and combined with a light 8oz carbine stock it results in a balance that should be within sneezing distance of a similar M16 A4 equipped with an A2 stock (though I don't have one to compare it with). Center of gravity unloaded is right at the delta ring.



    LOWER:

    Noveske N4 lower, stripped (Chainsaw)
    V7 “Heavy” buffer tube
    Sprinco White carbine spring
    H6 buffer
    Noveske QD end plate
    Wilson Combat TTU
    BAD-CASS
    BAD-EPS
    Colt accessory kit
    Colt castle nut
    Seekins billet mag release button
    HK Battlegrip V2
    LWRCi compact stock
    LWRCi enhanced trigger guard

    The LWRCi compact stock is one of a couple different designs offering compact SOPMOD-style ergonomics minus the battery and other storage compartments. many of us do not use – I prefer these lighter, slimmer designs. I am a bit disappointed that the stock cannot be locked into the first position on the RE without smacking the butt. I tested the stock on a friend's aluminum RE and had the same issue. Removing the buttpad revealed that stock is slightly too short, perhaps by just a millimeter or two, causing the RE to strike the inside of the buttpad. Markm was right: LWRCi can mess up something as simple as a stock. The search feature reveals that this is a known issue, so I will likely be trying the BCM Gunfighter stock when it is released.



    The HK Battlegrip offers a more vertical grip angle with a shape that I find more ergonomic than the BCM Gunfighter or Magpul K grips. Since Battle Arms does not make a full LPK, the Colt lower parts mostly completed the assembly ( the bolt catch spring was missing from the kit!) I would have liked a Seekins bolt catch, but it is evidently sold out everywhere on Earth and is going for crazy prices on eBay. The Colt castle nut? Well, none better.



    The sling is a VCAS 221. I'll be saving to purchase a magnified optic though I am still on the fence as how to proceed there. I'd hoped to get it to the range today to get the irons zeroed, but events interfered.
    “Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils.”
    - General John Stark, July 31, 1809

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Decatur, IN
    Posts
    1,854
    Feedback Score
    89 (97%)
    Dammit...... Now I want one..... lol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    56
    Feedback Score
    0
    Nice stick.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    where the army sends me
    Posts
    219
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Nice looking rifle, let us know how it shoots.
    The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step...and a lot of bitching.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    305
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks everyone. I'm going to get her to the range this weekend even if I have to crawl there with the rifle between my teeth.
    “Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils.”
    - General John Stark, July 31, 1809

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    429
    Feedback Score
    0
    Very nice -- I love a good 20" -- mine is a PSA with an FN barrel.

    Just one question -- you talk about wanting a carbine stock in part for the improved cheek weld. How so? Most people find that resting their cheek on the carbine buffer tube provides a worse cheek weld than a fixed stock -- that has certainly been my experience. My A4 started out with a collapsible stock, but I ended up going to a Magpul fixed rifle stock for better cheek weld, and the fact that I usually left the collapsible stock set at that length anyway.
    "This motto may adorn their tombs
    (Let tyrants come and view):
    We rather seek these silent rooms
    Than live as slaves to you."

    Lemuel Haynes, 1775

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,806
    Feedback Score
    0
    Looks like a fun shooter! I've become a big fan of the 20" musket. Be sure to let us know how she does this weekend.
    "Man is still the first weapon of war" - Field Marshal Montgomery

    The Everyday Marksman

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    305
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by henschman View Post
    Just one question -- you talk about wanting a carbine stock in part for the improved cheek weld. How so? Most people find that resting their cheek on the carbine buffer tube provides a worse cheek weld than a fixed stock -- that has certainly been my experience. My A4 started out with a collapsible stock, but I ended up going to a Magpul fixed rifle stock for better cheek weld, and the fact that I usually left the collapsible stock set at that length anyway.
    I think this goes to how far out you are extending the carbine stock. I am putting it at position 2 or 3, which means my cheek is resting on the wide cheekrest on the carbine stock and not on the buffer tube. If I were extending the stock farther and having to rest my cheek on the buffer tube, then yes that would suck.

    Edited to add: The pic shows the stock at position #3, but I am preferring it a little shorter at position #2.
    Last edited by carolvs; 05-21-14 at 03:05.
    “Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils.”
    - General John Stark, July 31, 1809

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
    Posts
    24,902
    Feedback Score
    104 (100%)
    Looks a lot like my AR15A5. I used the A5 system with a SOPMOD.



    Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/

    Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/

    M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141

    Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    391
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Love it, I'm putting one very similar together soon!

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
    President of Trigon Armament Inc.

    FFL-07 SOT-02

    AR-15 Armorer

    Competitive Shooter

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •