|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe this weekend I'll get Pappabear's E carrier out and do 10 rounds, quick bolt groups swap, and 10 rounds more to see if one carrier is more thrilling than the other.
"You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan
I would really recommend the A5 or rifle type buffer system before installing the e carrier. The e carrier tends to over speed and needs some added mass to slow it down.
Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/
Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/
M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141
Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com
I'm specifically interested in Mark's 11.5 which, IIRC, he tuned down significantly. I'm curious about what difference it introduces, positive or otherwise, and possible adjustments thereafter to make it run optimally.
Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/
Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/
M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141
Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com
No, I remember is being discussed that other thread. I'm seeing this as an opportunity to test it with the gas system being the only variable, and one that's adjustable at that. It'll be interesting to see how far it can be pushed.
Dd you try turning the block down to see where it would go? This is what I'm most curious about, specifically, how far down while maintaining reliability which the e-carrier appears to inherently increase. When you mentioned the slight increase in recoil, i remembered Grant's SBR and began to think about the possibility of it going the other way as gas is tuned down.
Bookmarks