Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: M1A Accuracy Expectations

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    208
    Feedback Score
    0

    M1A Accuracy Expectations

    I have a Springfield M1A loaded model with stainless air-guaged barrel, ARMS #18 mount, Leupold QRW Rings, and Leupold VXIII 4.5-14 scope. It has a rubber recoil buffer in it right now as well. The best I have been able to get out of this combo is about a 2" group at 100 yards with premium ammo. Is this typical accuracy for a loaded model? I was expecting it to do better than that.

    Are there any easy (read inexpensive or free) things I can do to make this a 1 MOA gun?

    Thanks for your help.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,023
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    2 moa sounds pretty good.

    You can probably tighten it up, but that involves unitizing the gas system, glass bedding the action in the stock and myriad other EXPENSIVE modifications.


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,645
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    It depends on what you want to do with it. Based on what a buddy said who has used these operationally, leave it alone and enjoy it as is.
    GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,265
    Feedback Score
    0
    I would echo Katars comments, that's pretty good. I would add trying different ammo types and if you reload work on a "match Load" for it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    208
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for the replies. This helps me set my expectations a little better. I had expected this rifle to be able to do 1 MOA-ish pretty easily and thought there might be something wrong. I'm going to take apart and reinstall the mount and switch out the rings since they keep shooting loose. I'm also going to work on the scope position and cheek pad to make it a little easier to position my head consistently.

    I might try bedding the stock and a few other things. I would like to get this to be a 1" rifle at some point.

    Thanks again for your help and suggestions.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    There was a reason the Army dropped the M14 as their primary sniper system. Semis are a lot harder to make into a hyper-accurate weapon. It's perfectly adequate in the squad support role but you can spend a lot of coin and still not significantly improve a loaded M1A's inherent accuracy. 2MOA seems pretty respectable.

    Assuming you haven't had any (correct me if I'm wrong) but I'd maybe start with a battle rifle class and see if that improves things first. It might also be a good resource for where you should invest your money to see the largest payoff.

    If you're really sure it's the M1A, than a specialist gunsmith upgrade (Smith Enterprises) with a new krieger barrel would be the place I'd start...of course you're going to drop $600-700...to start.

    Sure you wouldn't want a FAL?
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    208
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm not the best shooter in the world but I can keep my AR in an inch at the distance I'm getting 2 out of the M1A - although I would certainly learn a lot from any class. Before I would drop $600 or $800 into this rifle I would pick up something different.

    Are FAL'smore accurate than the M14/M1A? If I didn't already have all the extra magazines and parts I would probably just sell the M1a and get something else.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JB2000 View Post
    I'm not the best shooter in the world but I can keep my AR in an inch at the distance I'm getting 2 out of the M1A - although I would certainly learn a lot from any class. Before I would drop $600 or $800 into this rifle I would pick up something different.

    Are FAL'smore accurate than the M14/M1A? If I didn't already have all the extra magazines and parts I would probably just sell the M1a and get something else.
    Try not to think of it in those terms. They're not "more" accurate, just more accurate for the same money.

    An M14 probably has more potential accuracy, but for a lot less money you can get a FAL that's approximately the same. Does that make sense?

    All things being equal an AR has higher inherent and potential accuracy than both out to 100 yards so it's not really a fair comparison to either.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    208
    Feedback Score
    0
    John,

    That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for your insight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    52
    Feedback Score
    0
    Echoing some of the above, the M1A/M14 ruled the line at Camp Perry long after it was out of service, but they take a bit work to make them shoot 1moa. Once the heavy bullets for the AR15/M16 came on-line the M1A/M14 went, sadly, by the boards in competitive shooting.
    Also, very long range point of view, the scope mount situation has never been great.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •