I know. My point was that, in a conversation with your average Kool Aid drinking anti-gunner, the "modern sporting rifle" argument is often used as a response to "You can't hunt a deer with that gun. Why is anyone allowed to own one of those things?" Instead of obeying the gun control's orders that, in a debate, that we'd better find an innocent reason for wanting such a scary gun or concede that it should be banned, we need to stand firm and give our reasons why we own weapons like an AR-15. It doesn't mean descending into "Shall not be infringed! Don't tread on me! Molon labe, mother****er!" We can give honest but diplomatically delivered reasons why we support the right to own these rifles and, consequently, why the 68 sporter clause should be stricken from the record.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks