Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Too much optic? Optic choice for BCM hammer forged lightweight barrel.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,346
    Feedback Score
    48 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluedreaux View Post
    What did you hope to accomplish with the LW barrel? Don't buy an optic that'll ruin what you're trying to accomplish.
    Agreed. This is the reason I replaced the 1-6x LPVO with an micro RDS on my SR15. I wanted to retain the lightweight maneuverability of the rifle as much as possible, as opposed to carrying the weight penalty of a variable optic although it was more versatile. I will either have another upper or a complete rifle dedicated for that purpose and it will be equipped accordingly.
    "People have always been stupid. The Internet just makes it easier for us to know about them." - donlapalma

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    1,225
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Yes...
    Ain't no pockets on a shroud..

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    112
    Feedback Score
    0
    Nope.

    I am looking at a 2.5-10x44 Votex Viper HS for my 14.5" LW AR15 as we speak, and with it mounted my carbine will weigh 8.5 lbs unloaded which imo is pretty damn light for that scope setup.

    ETA The mount I will be using is non QD though and weighs 3oz. Its an Aero Precision which actually returns to zero quite well.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,810
    Feedback Score
    0
    The 1-4x lends itself more for general purpose use. I can see the 2.5-10 being fine on a LW barrel for a rifle that is carried a lot and shot a little (like a hunting gun). If you wanted a gun that would be good for spending long sessions at the range punching tiny groups in paper, then it would be better to have a heavier profile barrel. That said, I have a Centurion LW CHF build with that same PST 2.5-10x that you're looking at, and I love it. I find I enjoy it a lot more than when I had the TR-24 on it.
    "Man is still the first weapon of war" - Field Marshal Montgomery

    The Everyday Marksman

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Thanks for the replies, fellas.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    360
    Feedback Score
    0
    My opinion, which means little to nothing, is that a 2.5-10x or a 3-9 optic puts a carbine in more of a specialized role, than as a general purpose carbine. And since you have said multiple times that you anticipate this a general purpose carbine, I suspect it will be the wrong optic.

    I see a general purpose carbine as one that works well in a variety of roles.

    For example, my 11.5" pistol with an Aimpoint PRO is great for HD, but would be poor choice at 600 yards. And my 16" Stealth with a VX-R 3-9 is great at range, but is poor up close. My 16" LW with a VX-R 1.25-4x is good up close and pretty good at distance.

    Really up to you as to what your primary anticipated use is of course.
    Last edited by friendlyfireisnt; 06-18-14 at 23:57.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Sandhills NC
    Posts
    610
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    For general purpose the 1-4x will offer much more use. Faster target acquisition and the ability to find targets much faster by keeping both eyes open on setting 1.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    That's what I figured, but am leaning toward the 2.5-10x32, as I have an Aimpoint equipped AR for the shorter end of the range spectrum.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •