A little common sense from SCOTUS.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...hone-searches/
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A little common sense from SCOTUS.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...hone-searches/
Like Hussein's goon squad gives a fork what the Courts say?
"You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan
True. At least it may slow them down a tad.
Nothing really new here -- generally you secure the phone to preserve evidence and get a warrant. Anyone acting differently was already risking it getting tossed.
Kevin S. Boland
Manager, Federal Sales
FN America, LLC
Office: 703.288.3500 x181 | Mobile: 407-451-4544 | Fax: 703.288.4505
www.fnhusa.com
Nah. Everything will be a major security risk now. It will keep the locals at bay to a better degree, but the Feds will keep doing what they want in the name of national security.
In all seriousness it is a bit if common sense from the court. Unexpected, but I'll take it none the less.
A lot of the effect will have nothing to with risk of pending charges getting tossed. Search cell phone of a dealer, pimp, gang member, etc. And you get a list of known associates, then let them go. Now that is not going to happen. It will also slow-down quasi govt officials such as school administrators from searching phones. Could have wide reaching effects.
Now maybe SCOTUS can do something about We the People being tracked (Stringray) via celluar phone . . . HAH, who am I kid'n?!
"In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf
"We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18
Bookmarks