Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 132

Thread: "Hypermilitarized police departments are more dangerous than whatever they fight."

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bighawk View Post
    I was in a class the other taught by one of the metro swat guys and he used the word "operator" when talking about his team mates multiple times.

    It took a lot of effort to keep my opinion on that to myself.
    Maybe he meant Coperator.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    So that means they shouldn't receive qualified immunity right? Or tax dollars, subsidies, LEOSA, etc...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    So that means they shouldn't receive qualified immunity right? Or tax dollars, subsidies, LEOSA, etc...
    No no no silly.....it means they get the benefits of both with the drawbacks of neither.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    I drove through Belen, NM not long ago, on a road trip, and they've got an MRAP parked out in front of their station.

    Belen has a population of 7200 according to Google.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    ROCKET CITY, USA
    Posts
    3,196
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    ABNAK...yes sir..its Frontier Days this weekend. For the first time ever for some reason the crowds weren't there en masse as usual. HOT. Then had a 35-40 minute downpour. Then HOT...and MUGGY. I tripped on back to Huntsville AL.
    " Be NOT ye afraid of them..
    Remember the Lord, for He is GREAT & TERRIBLE!
    FIGHT for your bretheren..for your sons & for your daughters,
    for your wives & for your households"!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    800
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    So that means they shouldn't receive qualified immunity right? Or tax dollars, subsidies, LEOSA, etc...
    It would seem they can't play both sides of the fence.

    What's next? Sworn Blackwater employees running around patrolling?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    773
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    Maybe he meant Coperator.
    Haha thats a good one.. I might use that next time this converstion topic comes up with friends

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,706
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    It's quite easy.

    Eliminate the war on drugs, and the fuzz no longer has a need for MRAPs and other stupid shit.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    800
    Feedback Score
    0
    It'd be a war on something else. Politicians and bureaucrats aren't big on having their budget cut.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,916
    Feedback Score
    0
    [QUOTE=ABNAK;1942195] If I were chief of a local popo department I would immediately institute the following (funds allowing of course):


    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    2) Button-down "dress" style shirt with no sewn-on name tags. Departmental patch allowed on sleeve, all other accoutrements would be shiny badge and nameplate. Kind of an Adam-12 look.
    . So you'd have a policy that compromises officer safety by forcing them forcing them to wear reflective items on their uniforms? Nevernind the increased cost of dress type uniforms with regard to care and maintenance. And are you going to fund replacements every time a name tag or badge is ripped off and lost/broken during a scuffle?



    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    4) Long gun (AR) allowed in trunk of cruiser, otherwise it's sidearm and shotgun only for public view.
    . This is beyond fracking stupid... Again you're willing to sacrifice officer safety for appearance sake. The AR is more effective and easier to master than the shotgun. It's the way of the future for LE and for good reason. If people are freaked out by seeing them being carried by good guys or in cruisers... those fearful fools should get some psychological assistance. In an active shooter or a hundred other scenarios there won't be time to get anything from the trunk.



    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    7) Officers appearing to be or reported as being a little too "gung-ho" would have their heels locked in my office the first time, suspended the next.
    . I'm dying to hear your definition of gung ho. Especially since you plan to discipline officers over gossipy nonsense. You should get some leadership training before being put in charge of anyone.

    All of the above clearly shows you don't know what you don't know. It might make you feel better to spout off about how you'd fix all those "perceived" problems. But your ideas are so far out of touch it's like listening to an 8th grader explain how to save the world from hunger.
    Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.

Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •