Feel good story. sexual predator gets his.

[Scrubber3]

Looks like he will be eating from a straw for a while... Awesome post, thanks for sharing


Typos brought to you by the letter ___.

[Voodoo_Man]

I prefer this outcome to the alternative, but I'd feel better (in reference to "feel good") if it hadn't happened at all. Technically, did the father break the law? No doubt, you wouldn't find a DA to press charges nor a jury to convict (which is fine by me) but is that technically excessive force above what the law would view as protecting the child?

I ask out of curiosity and my sympathy meter for the guy who got his a$$ kicked, remains at zero.

I'd argue that the father did not break the law. Sexual assaults are a gray area for the entire force spectrum, especially where the victim is a child.

Also who is to say what the father did to the offender was "excessive" or even too little?

[williejc]

Technically excessive? That interpretation depends upon the locality. In the deep South or Southwest, no. In Seattle or Portland, probably. I hope that the perp doesn't file a civil suit. When I was growing up in Mississippi during the 1950s and 60s, the father could have shot the molester--whatever the race--and "got a medal". Then, child molesters were very rare, and it may have had something to do with a short life span. They just seemed to disappear. When you consider that the victims' lives are often ruined by this abuse, it's difficult to justify allowing the abuser to breathe good air. Perhaps we should have a separate prison for rapists and child molesters and don't put baloney on their baloney sandwiches.

[WillBrink]

I'd argue that the father did not break the law. Sexual assaults are a gray area for the entire force spectrum, especially where the victim is a child.

Also who is to say what the father did to the offender was "excessive" or even too little?

Hence my Q. I don't know the answer. But, as mentioned, short of setting the guy on fire, very few will consider it excessive force in such a case as you say.

[WillBrink]

Technically excessive? That interpretation depends upon the locality. In the deep South or Southwest, no. In Seattle or Portland, probably. I hope that the perp doesn't file a civil suit. When I was growing up in Mississippi during the 1950s and 60s, the father could have shot the molester--whatever the race--and "got a medal". Then, child molesters were very rare, and it may have had something to do with a short life span. They just seemed to disappear. When you consider that the victims' lives are often ruined by this abuse, it's difficult to justify allowing the abuser to breathe good air. Perhaps we should have a separate prison for rapists and child molesters and don't put baloney on their baloney sandwiches.

If it were MA, he'd get an award and have the ACLU backing him for being beaten up as a civil rights abuse or some such BS.

[Voodoo_Man]

Hence my Q. I don't know the answer. But, as mentioned, short of setting the guy on fire, very few will consider it excessive force in such a case as you say.

The answer is only for a DA and a grand jury to decide. We had a few cases locally were moms and dads walked in on their kid(s) getting raped and they beat them, with sticks, one guy got shot (lived) and one was thrown out of a second floor window. No charges.

[WillBrink]

The answer is only for a DA and a grand jury to decide. We had a few cases locally were moms and dads walked in on their kid(s) getting raped and they beat them, with sticks, one guy got shot (lived) and one was thrown out of a second floor window. No charges.

Justice prevails!

[SeriousStudent]

Hopefully he pleads so that the kid doesnt have to relive it in court.

Definitely agree with this.

Prayers sent for the child and his family.

[Waylander]

I feel better after that sick shit I posted about yesterday

Technically excessive? That interpretation depends upon the locality. In the deep South or Southwest, no. In Seattle or Portland, probably. I hope that the perp doesn't file a civil suit. When I was growing up in Mississippi during the 1950s and 60s, the father could have shot the molester--whatever the race--and "got a medal". Then, child molesters were very rare, and it may have had something to do with a short life span. They just seemed to disappear. When you consider that the victims' lives are often ruined by this abuse, it's difficult to justify allowing the abuser to breathe good air. Perhaps we should have a separate prison for rapists and child molesters and don't put baloney on their baloney sandwiches.

Definitely more of this. I don't like it anymore than most people but if it's a clear cut case they need to be severely beaten at least. I wouldn't have stopped until he was dead.
Even after a beating I don't think they learn and still have the perverted mind. Mob execution is the only thing to get it done when activist judges let them off on friggin' probation.

[Honu]

have to ask why was this guy in the house ? friend or what ?

but good for him to bad the guy was still alive !!!!!