It's November 9th 2016

[ABNAK]

No, it was the media and DNC going all out in an effort to destroy Romney or any other GOP contender that got Obama his second term.

For all that he might not be, Romney is a good man overall. And I've never seen anyone get pummeled like he did. All he needed to do was sprout horns and everything would have been complete in their world.

And yes, he would have been a far better President than Obama.

My dog would have been a better POTUS than Obama. And the MSM beating on and demonizing a Republican candidate is nothing new so you should be quite used to it.

Never said Romney wasn't a "good man". Carter was a "good man" but sucked as POTUS.

All I'm saying is that there are ample candidates out there to actually vote for instead of holding your nose and voting against the Democrat. Someone in the mold of Cruz/Paul/Lee? Walker begins to stray into RINO territory and Bush/Christie are firmly in that camp.

[Caeser25]

The other primary problem is they aren't all held on the same night. The first few states decide the primary. To start out in Iowa, you HAVE to pander and support the farm subsidies.

[ABNAK]

The other primary problem is they aren't all held on the same night. The first few states decide the primary. To start out in Iowa, you HAVE to pander and support the farm subsidies.

I said after the 2008 election that the primary system needs to be revamped to all on one night and let the chips fall where they may. That of course would be a massive no-go to the Republican Establishment who would lose the opportunity to carefully manipulate and cull the candidates.

[No.6]

I have to agree with the all on one night primary scheme. By the time the primary "season" makes it's way to Texas it's usually already a "done deal".
Besides when are we going to learn that we MUST vote for whomever the New York Times thinks will be the best candidate to run against the Democrat nominee? (Yeah, read between the lines and you'll understand what I'm saying.)

[ABNAK]

I have to agree with the all on one night primary scheme. By the time the primary "season" makes it's way to Texas it's usually already a "done deal".
Besides when are we going to learn that we MUST vote for whomever the New York Times thinks will be the best candidate to run against the Democrat nominee? (Yeah, read between the lines and you'll understand what I'm saying.)

Same with Tennessee. We're not speshul and "enlightened" enough to make those big early primary decisions.......

[ColtSeavers]

An alternative point of view, which (after eight presidential elections) I am beginning to embrace:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

I always liked this as well

[austinN4]

I always liked this as well (Vote None of the Above!)

A strategy guaranteed to put another demoncrat in the WH.

[ColtSeavers]

A strategy guaranteed to put another demoncrat in the WH.

LMAO! You just keep telling yourself that....

I love the hypocrisy of voting for someone you do not want to simply because of party affiliation. The party system has doomed this country.

[morbidbattlecry]

Not voting. But what i am doing is buying a bunch of Wasrs and Cheap Ar15s to resale to retards panic buying. Well i may vote, but selling cheap guns at 300% mark up is first on my list.

[SteyrAUG]

Depends who is running. But if Rand gets the GOP nomination then absolutely.