
Originally Posted by
steyrman13
I don't think CK ruined JV reputation. I think JV did that all on his own way before CK made a statement about 1 paragraph long in a book. For ex. I pretty much knew exactly who he was referring too while reading his book before I knew anything about the fight in the media or CK on tv saying it was JV. This means that his reputation was already tainted. On top of that, CK didn't profit only because of that one little excerpt in his book, his book sold for people wanting to read about the American hero.
While I agree it could have been left out, it certainly didn't all of the sudden change JV reputation.
Now we see JV is going atl free the publisher which he claims "didn't do his due diligence to bet the story." Well it shouldn't matter, because the book does not specifically name JV it talks about a character named scruff face.
How would anyone have known who it was to even as CK in interviews (or even think it important to ask in interviews since it was such a small and sidetracked, unimportant part of the book) if people couldn't already draw the conclusion who it was based off of the reputation of JV in the first place alluding more that his reputation was not hurt by a small statement in a book
I disagree. JV was developing the reputation as a moonbat conspiracy theorist, but not a traitor or someone with disdain for his country. It appears that he was courting the Alex Jones crowd for his future livelihood. CK's comments in the book and on TV shifted this image to something on the level of the Westboro Baptist Church which made JV unemployable. You may disagree but that is how a jury saw it.
I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.
Bookmarks