Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Barack Hussein Soebarkah(In Two Places At The Same Time?)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Superior Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,697
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Barack Hussein Soebarkah(In Two Places At The Same Time?)

    The 44th President of the United States is, of course, Barack Hussein Obama II.


    Barack Hussein Obama II has also been known by names such as Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, and Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah).


    To be sure, only supposed madmen note that the name "Soebarkah" originated in very tight spatiotemporal proximity to the operations of a cult called "Subud" that was founded by a Muslim named Mohammad Subuh -- a cult wherein personal name changes were the order of the day.


    That Soebarkah's mother associated with members of the cult, and that, some 45 years later, a leader of the cult (Deliana Loretta Fuddy) would be the first non-medical doctor in the state of Hawaii to run the State's Department of Health (and therefore have custody over Soebarkah's long form birth certificate) is, shall we say, rather odd -- but nothing more than that, except to the most determined and deluded of conspiracy theorists.


    Conspiracy theorists might add that cult leader Fuddy, relatively soon after her certification of Soebarkah's origins, apparently perished in a plane crash survived by everyone on board including the cult leader herself -- until the cult leader, post-collision, poetically disengaged a hand and was swallowed by the ocean.


    But, this is truly sheer madness -- all of it; there's simply no denying it.


    And yet, the depths of the madness inspired by the most transformative of presidents remain unfathomed -- even by the most ardent of conspiracy theorists.


    You see, there are certain very queer facts about the nameshifter that not even the most ardent conspiracy theorist will want to deny.


    Astoundingly, it would appear that Soebarkah could be in two places at the same time.

    From The American Thinker this past winter, you should read it very carefully, that it was penned by a professor of criminology is quite intriguing, to say the least....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wakanda
    Posts
    18,863
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Right over the herd's heads. It’s just racism, tinfoil, and conspiracy . . . bahahaha.
    "In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf


    "We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    6,162
    Feedback Score
    0
    It will take more than this to resuscitate the "Birther" movement. Don't get me wrong, I love to find anything, I mean an-y-th-ing to take this guy out of office, but this ship has sailed. Even if we proved that he was some type of Manchurian Candidate, the damage has been done since SCOTUS would never invalidate his signed bills.
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Superior Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,697
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sensei View Post
    It will take more than this to resuscitate the "Birther" movement. Don't get me wrong, I love to find anything, I mean an-y-th-ing to take this guy out of office, but this ship has sailed. Even if we proved that he was some type of Manchurian Candidate, the damage has been done since SCOTUS would never invalidate his signed bills.
    In my opinion, the real issue revolving around the opaqueness of Obama has been, and continues to be, the ambivalence of the 18-34 year old class regarding the issue of his birth, and vetting in particular. That this generation quite obviously could care less is all but proven, such cynicism is a reflection of their decadence, and it is by no means restricted to this one issue, it saturates most of their worldview, and manifests itself in variously destructive rationalization, which is apparent in their embracing of vice as constitutionally sacred virtue, which is why they are so at ease with resorting to inane constitutional rhetoric as justification for destroying the nation from within. They pursue every vice and amorality as constitutionally protected, sacred liberties, which of course is is tediously childish and immature. They behave just as they have been programmed, to embrace decadence and ambivalence as virtue by their self absorbed baby boomer parents, and the Marxists who lock down the USA's public education system, the result absolutely devastating to behold....

    In other words, that this mans ridiculously nebulous personal history, along with the multitude of dubious explanations rationalizing it are not, and never have been an issue for them, is the real issue! Obama is not a "Manchurian Candidate" as you put it, the generation that rationalizes him is.....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    2,474
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Why can't I stop reading Soebarkah as Sardaukar?

    At any rate, Clint Eastwood got it right, greatest hoax to date.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I just can't believe THIS GUY actually became the President.



    Isn't this the kind of person who was doomed to working dead end jobs at the mall? And quite honestly, if we really were going to elect a person solely based on the novelty of having the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT, is this really the best we could have done?

    I actually think Neil Tyson, with his degree in physics and masters in astronomy and astrophysics, and a complete lack of education in law or political science would have made a better President. As would several thousand other black people who have no specific political background either.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,990
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Denali, I agree with what you state except for the age bracket. There are plenty of my aging Boomers that are all in on these very narcissistic and corrosive actions and beliefs. I know many libertarian/conservatives in that younger bracket as well. Any way you slice it, by religion, age, etc it comes that around 50% or more vote for this crap regardless of how that group is suppose to believe. The civic rot is widespread.
    It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! ... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry in an address at St. John’s Church, Richmond, Virginia, on March 23, 1775.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,625
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    As William F. Buckley was fond of saying, I'd rather be governed by the first 100 names in the Boston phonebook than by the faculty of Harvard. This guy was picked by the Harvard faculty, a choice foisted upon the rest of us by the intellectual elites.

    "Addressing the problem of shootings by ban or confiscation of non-criminal's guns is like addressing the problem of rape by chopping off the Johnson of everyone who DIDN't rape anyone while not only leaving the rapists' equipment intact, but giving them free viagra to boot." --Me

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wakanda
    Posts
    18,863
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cincinnatus View Post
    As William F. Buckley was fond of saying, I'd rather be governed by the first 100 names in the Boston phonebook than by the faculty of Harvard. This guy was picked by the Harvard faculty, a choice foisted upon the rest of us by the intellectual elites.
    Every POTUS in at least the last half century has been recruited at Ivy League schools while in their early twenties. Barry was set up from his conception by radical reds.

    As far as age group, I'm in my early thirties and have seen right through the smoke and mirrors. There are plenty of people above the age of 34 to include my 96 year old grandfather who voted for this fraud twice.
    "In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf


    "We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,843
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I just can't believe THIS GUY actually became the President.



    Isn't this the kind of person who was doomed to working dead end jobs at the mall? And quite honestly, if we really were going to elect a person solely based on the novelty of having the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT, is this really the best we could have done?

    I actually think Neil Tyson, with his degree in physics and masters in astronomy and astrophysics, and a complete lack of education in law or political science would have made a better President. As would several thousand other black people who have no specific political background either.
    I can't believe the majority of voters voted for Obama twice.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •