James Brady's death ruled a homicide from 1981 shooting

[Renegade]

Hinkley lives in Williamsburg, VA ... pretty sure I saw his picture in the paper just a month or so ago. Lives with mother in condo complex or gated community... can't remember which.

His mom lives in Kingsmill, I have family there so it is a known local story.

[Kain]

WWWHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFFFFFFUUUUUUUKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!










If I die tonight, someone please make sure to rule it a homicide from being given an anurisum from this bullshit! And make sure someone pays!!!!! I am counting on you guys!!!!


"Come here mister bottle of Jack!!! Tell me nice things because I want to forget this bullshit!!!"

[Honu]

We have jumped the shark sadly I think the us has had it's day unless half the idiots in this country die or leave this is the new norm


All deaths will now be from global warming ! And you will see this happen I guarantee it

[SteyrAUG]

On the plus side, it might keep Hinkley locked up for a long, long time. He's been getting weekend passes and his parents have petitioned to have him released under their home custody. This might very well put the kibosh on those plans.

I suspect they will have their cake and eat it too, death will be ruled a homocide but no changes in Hinkley's status.

[NCPatrolAR]

Uh; it isn't uncommon to have a death ruled a homicide if the death happened due to the injuries sustained during a felonious assault.

[No.6]

Straight from the "B" movies; really slow motion death scene....

[glocktogo]

Uh; it isn't uncommon to have a death ruled a homicide if the death happened due to the injuries sustained during a felonious assault.

Understood, but this one is absolutely, positively, 100% politically motivated. Sorry, but I call BS.

[Kain]

Uh; it isn't uncommon to have a death ruled a homicide if the death happened due to the injuries sustained during a felonious assault.

But 30+ years after the fact? Trust me, if it was a year, two years or one or two more and the guy was a veggie or in a comma then sure, fry the MFer who was the trigger man. But 30 years and functioning, at least somewhat, at the very least I kind of have to call this one as I see it which is to say BS. And worse yet, political bullshit. Does this mean that when my uncle dies I his widow can claim he died from wounds suffered as a marine during Nam and get the benefits from that? I don't want to sound like I am calling you out, I know where you are coming from trust me, but I just can't see how this can be ruled a homicide given what we know here now(I say this because there is a chance, albeit small, that there was a bullet, bone, soul frag, ect (ETA wound never healing at which piont I question how he lived 30+ years)and work its way to the brain or the heart and caused the death at which point I again would say there is reason.) Though, again being 30+ years after the fact I think you might have a better chance at claiming medical malpractice for the doctor not catching the issue beforehand since they had ample time to catch it than the shooter.

EX: Are we going to re-rule Reagan's death a homicide since he was injured too during the shooting?


I don't want to delete everything I just typed(because I feel I am not perfectly clear and other issues, like I am too focused on you and I shouldn't be) but I just think it might be stretching things saying 30 years later a person's death is a homicide because they were injured in a shooting 30 years ago WITHOUT information of that being the cause. And, again, I want to make clear, I am not calling you out, because I know exactly where you are coming from on this, but 30 years is a stretch in my opinion for this baring other information.

That said, if you have precedent of where this has happened before I am all ears, both in this regard and from a professional and academic standpoint and would love to hear it, trust me. Because, while I am aware of deaths related to injuries after weeks, or even months, being ruled homicides, I have never heard of one involving decades.



P.S.
I hope I am making sense.
If you want to take it to PM I'll clear out the box. Because I have had a few(See previous post, and no I can't offer you any since the bottle is now empty), but short of other evidence it just appears to me to be a bit politically motivated. Maybe I am coming from this from the standpoint I don't want to be a political rally point. I don't know.

[NCPatrolAR]

Understood, but this one is absolutely, positively, 100% politically motivated. Sorry, but I call BS.

Most people go with a political angle instead of a logical one when democrats are involved

[jpmuscle]

Uh; it isn't uncommon to have a death ruled a homicide if the death happened due to the injuries sustained during a felonious assault.

x2. I don't see this going anywhere. Same for Hinckley as he's already been adjudicated. They could probably bring new charges but as the original trial was a s**t show in regards to the mental health aspect the outcome is not going to change.

As for the political aspect what are they going to say? A crazy guy with a gun killed someone. Not exactly a new rallying cry IMO.