Looks pretty slick! We'll see if it actually gets funded/fielded. I'm happy to see them departing from traditional helicopter configurations.
http://www.militarytimes.com/article...S04/310080043/
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Looks pretty slick! We'll see if it actually gets funded/fielded. I'm happy to see them departing from traditional helicopter configurations.
http://www.militarytimes.com/article...S04/310080043/
Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.
Waste of money. But the military industrial complex is going to fund itself....
The Sikorsky eliminates the problem from retreating blade stall by using two counter rotating main rotors. With a single MR, blade stall is a problem because the helicopter loses lift on the retreating blade side. By using two counter rotating MRs, the helicopter has an attacking blade on each side to counteract the effects of the retreating blades to maintain symmetry of lift. Blade stall isn't eliminated, it's counteracted and top airspeed can be increased safely
INSIDE PLAN OF BOX
- ROAD-RUNNER LIFTS GLASS OF WATER- PULLING UP MATCH
- MATCH SCRATCHES ON MATCH-BOX
- MATCH LIGHTS FUSE TO TNT
- BOOM!
- HA-HA!!
-WILE E. COYOTE, AUTHOR OF "EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW IN LIFE, I LEARNED FROM GOLDBERG & MURPHY"
I am American
Bookmarks