
Originally Posted by
Eurodriver
How did he add fuel to the fire?
He said police shouldn't be militarized and hopes congress eliminates the program giving them free reign on surplus war equipment. Who would disagree with that??
I would. Because we gun owners bristle at the idea that we would be denied access to surplus war equipment. Where does it say that when you pin a badge on your shirt that you sign away your own 2nd Amendment rights? Look at the drug cartels and street gangs, not to mention terrorists who will, if they haven't already, get into the U.S. They're armed to the teeth, and I don't want police officers who have to go up against them armed only with billy clubs and revolvers just because we think SWAT teams look too scary.
And look at the rhetoric many are feeding into: These weapons are for war and have no place on America's streets. If we're talking about local PDs, we give a hearty "AMEN!" If they're talking about us, we give a hearty "HELL NO! DON'T TREAD ON ME!" And remember, when we deny local LE agencies military grade weaponry, what we're saying is that we want all the high speed stuff to be concentrated in the hands of federal LE and the military.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin
there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee
Bookmarks