Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Obama Finally Truthful: "We Don't Have a Strategy..."

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,100
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post
    "Lock-box."
    Now that's just weird. I installed a lockbox for the gate key out at the "ranch" about noon today.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,888
    Feedback Score
    44 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by montanadave View Post
    Now that's just weird. I installed a lockbox for the gate key out at the "ranch" about noon today.
    I was quoting the original SNL skit, that gave birth to the term "strategery".

    Or, it just means you did not spot the drone. We make them pretty quiet now.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Superior Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,697
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    WH Rules: Violation in Terrorist Swap Punishable By Jail, Suspension, Removal

    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    At least he had one. Wasn't one of the best but at least he has a plan. I really thought Bush 43 screwed things up as bad as possible with his "Let's fix it while we are here" Iraq plan. Leave it to Obama to expand the stupidity into Syria and fail to realize that if you destabilize the existing government radical Islamic militants will fill the void. Now gee where did that happen before in recent history?

    And yeah, Obama saying he doesn't have a plan is about as enlightening as him announcing he is half black. Amazing that he managed to single handedly recreate the Iraqi fisaco in Syria, restart a Cold War with Russia and help build a radical group of Islamic extremists who are even worse than Al Quida. That is an impressive days work. Carter is probably in awe.
    Speaking of Obama plans,

    The law violated by the Obama administration when it secretly exchanged five Guantanamo terrorists for an Army solider captured by the Taliban after deserting his post is punishable by jail, suspension and removal of office, according to written White House rules.

    The nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), confirmed this week that the president broke a “clear and unambiguous” law when he swapped the high-level terrorists for Bowe Bergdahl, an Army sergeant who went AWOL in Afghanistan in 2009. According to rules issued by the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the violation is serious and can carry severe consequences. They include fines, imprisonment, administrative discipline, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office, the rules specifically state.

    The five Gitmo captives that were turned over to the Taliban held positions of great importance with the renowned terrorist group, including Chief of Staff of the Taliban Army and the Taliban Deputy Minister of Intelligence. They have American blood on their hands, according to a U.S. Senator who refers to the freed jihadists as the “Taliban Dream Team.” It’s atrocious enough that our commander-in-chief would even consider freeing these terrorists under any circumstances, even if no established law impeded him from doing it.

    But Congress must be notified before acts of this magnitude are committed and the president completely disregarded the legislative branch. In fact the Department of Defense (DOD) failed to notify Congress at least 30 days in advance of the exchange, a flagrant violation of the law, and misused nearly $1 million of a wartime account to make the transfer, the GAO report says. The DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, congressional investigators found. This means the DOD violated a measure known as the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from incurring obligations exceeding an amount available in appropriation.

    In a nutshell, Obama and his appointees flipped the finger at Congress, the American public and the rule of law
    This guy is a catastrophe, worse however is the lack of any effective leadership in the republican party, whose "job one" following the midterms, should be removing this guy from office, and sending him off to a cell of his own at Guantanamo...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Denali View Post
    This guy is a catastrophe, worse however is the lack of any effective leadership in the republican party, whose "job one" following the midterms, should be removing this guy from office, and sending him off to a cell of his own at Guantanamo...

    Don't kid yourself, the Republicans would NEVER put into place the means of sending a President to jail for fear it would be used against them. Additionally, it is almost a certainty that the Republicans will run some dipshit they believe has "broad appeal" in the foolish notion that they will get liberal / minority votes somehow and we will suffer through 8 years of President Hillary Clinton who will win for no better reason than the novelty of electing the FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT.

    Then a bunch of jackasses can feel like they were "part of history" just like they did with Obama and will one day brag to their grandchildren how they helped elect the first black President and first female President and they will remember it as a seminal event like being at Woodstock, which is an apt analogy because they are both essentially insignificant participation in something they actually contributed nothing to beyond their mere presence and yet somehow it became a pivotal point of their existence.

    And they will truly feel like they personally changed the world for the better.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    7,935
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Don't kid yourself, the Republicans would NEVER put into place the means of sending a President to jail for fear it would be used against them. Additionally, it is almost a certainty that the Republicans will run Mitt Romney again they believe has "broad appeal" in the foolish notion that they will get liberal / minority votes somehow and we will suffer through 8 years of President Hillary Clinton who will win for no better reason than the novelty of electing the FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT.

    Then a bunch of jackasses can feel like they were "part of history" just like they did with Obama and will one day brag to their grandchildren how they helped elect the first black President and first female President and they will remember it as a seminal event like being at Woodstock, which is an apt analogy because they are both essentially insignificant participation in something they actually contributed nothing to beyond their mere presence and yet somehow it became a pivotal point of their existence.

    And they will truly feel like they personally changed the world for the better.
    FIFY.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Posts
    1,181
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Don't kid yourself, the Republicans would NEVER put into place the means of sending a President to jail for fear it would be used against them. Additionally, it is almost a certainty that the Republicans will run some dipshit they believe has "broad appeal" in the foolish notion that they will get liberal / minority votes somehow and we will suffer through 8 years of President Hillary Clinton who will win for no better reason than the novelty of electing the FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT.

    Then a bunch of jackasses can feel like they were "part of history" just like they did with Obama and will one day brag to their grandchildren how they helped elect the first black President and first female President and they will remember it as a seminal event like being at Woodstock, which is an apt analogy because they are both essentially insignificant participation in something they actually contributed nothing to beyond their mere presence and yet somehow it became a pivotal point of their existence.

    And they will truly feel like they personally changed the world for the better.

    Do you work for a news organization as a political analyst? Sounds like a fair synopsis of the 2016 election....


    NRA Life Member
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Posts
    1,181
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Denali View Post
    Speaking of Obama plans,





    This guy is a catastrophe, worse however is the lack of any effective leadership in the republican party, whose "job one" following the midterms, should be removing this guy from office, and sending him off to a cell of his own at Guantanamo...


    I doubt that you really think that there is any chance of O getting held responsible for this or any his his other actions. If anyone gets "hung" for this it'll be a lower level government functionary or some Colonel or General. And I seriously doubt even that will occur.


    NRA Life Member
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by No.6 View Post
    Do you work for a news organization as a political analyst? Sounds like a fair synopsis of the 2016 election....
    Never happen, I'd tell the truth so I wouldn't last three days. But since I have my magic 8 ball working, I'm betting that the 2016 election year panic buy (because it is now a cyclic event that will happen every election regardless of who is running), will completely eclipse the last two we saw.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,406
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Idk. I'm pretty sure were way past incompetence here. Look at everything this man does, says, apparently thinks and only conclusion one can come to is that this apparent bumbling is intentional and intent on enabling our enemies. The man hates this country.
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    OK or MO
    Posts
    574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Can't wait get a different set of genitals in there, if Hilary can handle Benghazi, the ultimate terrorist army will be easy peasy...


    ISIS is on the move, very powerful, and unequivocally motivated. Can't wait to dance on their graves.
    ‘‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.’’
    — Mahatma Ghandi

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •